Print and Public Politics in the English Revolution 2013
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107360297.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Print and lobbying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The format of this petition -printed on a single sheet with few "decorative devices" -suggests that it was likely intended for private circulation amongst MPs, rather than distributed publically to garner popular support for her appeal. 60 That said, news of Mary's petitioning activity at Westminster soon reached the provinces. On an unspecified day in May 1660, the Worcestershire gentleman Henry Townshend recorded in his diary that: Dr Hewit's widow petitioned the parliament for justice against the illegal president Lisle and that he may be as a murderer excepted from pardon in the act of oblivion.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The format of this petition -printed on a single sheet with few "decorative devices" -suggests that it was likely intended for private circulation amongst MPs, rather than distributed publically to garner popular support for her appeal. 60 That said, news of Mary's petitioning activity at Westminster soon reached the provinces. On an unspecified day in May 1660, the Worcestershire gentleman Henry Townshend recorded in his diary that: Dr Hewit's widow petitioned the parliament for justice against the illegal president Lisle and that he may be as a murderer excepted from pardon in the act of oblivion.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Printing was not necessarily a political act: as printing became more affordable and accessible, private petitioners could make use of print in what Jason Peacey has termed 'discreet' petitioning. 23 Assemblies or authorities could also choose to publish petitions or summaries for their own purposes, as seen in the Swedish Riksdag in the period of limited constitutional monarchy between 1719 and 1772. 24 Recourse to print for oppositional reasons was most visible in England in the 1640s and 1650s, but it was also adopted elsewhere, often through texts disguised as something other than a petition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%