Principles of Rural-Urban Sociology.

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Educational Sociology.

Critical Agrarian Studies as Populist Land-Grab

“…These negative appraisals include, among others, critiques by Nanda (2001Nanda ( , 2004, Petras (1990Petras ( , 2002 and Brass (1997Brass ( , 2000Brass ( , 2014Brass ( , 2020. Marxist critiques of populism are not the only absences, since missing from the Handbook are references to important political analyses both by historians of agrarian populism and by populists themselves (Laclau, 2005;Mitrany, 1951;Sorokin and Zimmerman, 1939;Venturi, 1960;Wortman, 1967), whose views might usefully have been compared to -and contrasted with -those held by current exponents, not least by underlining the lack of CAS 'newness'. 8.…”

Rural Land Management Interaction with Urbanization

“…After the 1973 coup, the dictatorship ushered in a nationwide neoliberal counterreform that instituted a series of measures, such as the restitution of expropriated properties, the division, sale, and auction of 'settlements' as individual parcels, the liberalization of the land market, and the creation of a water market. This fostered the emergence of small and medium-sized agricultural enterprises and large, high-tech capitalist operations linked to the global market [124,133]. In the Calama oasis, however, the counter-reform acquired a different expression.…”

The Interaction between Urban and Rural Areas: An Updated Paradigmatic, Methodological and Bibliographic Review

“…Geographical space has long been viewed and analysed as a continuum, containing a gradual transition from urban to rural and vice versa, without remarkable territorial discontinuities [133]. However, this interpretation has been challenged by some authors [134] and updated and reformulated by others [135][136][137].…”