2008
DOI: 10.1002/9780470758731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles and Practice of Variable Pressure/Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (VP‐ESEM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
181
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
181
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that areas of higher water content such as cytoplasm or extracellular space show a brighter grey level in the in-lens image than lipid-rich structures such as membranes and myelin. This effect is probably due to differences in charge dissipation which cause negative (SE1-release promoting) or positive (SE1-release suppressing) surface potentials as discussed (see chapter 5 (Stokes, 2008)). Surface potentials can be also influenced by Ga + implantation and loss of charged milling products during FIB milling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed that areas of higher water content such as cytoplasm or extracellular space show a brighter grey level in the in-lens image than lipid-rich structures such as membranes and myelin. This effect is probably due to differences in charge dissipation which cause negative (SE1-release promoting) or positive (SE1-release suppressing) surface potentials as discussed (see chapter 5 (Stokes, 2008)). Surface potentials can be also influenced by Ga + implantation and loss of charged milling products during FIB milling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be due to relying more on unconfirmed assumptions than on rigorous quantitative analysis of the system. The present findings suggest that previous works expounding on the purpose and capabilities of ESEM (Cameron & Donald 1994;Stokes et al 2004;Stokes 2006;Griffin 2007;Stokes & Baken 2007;Toth et al 2007;Stokes 2008;Stokes et al 2008) should be looked at in a new light, and also in view of related prior works by the present author (Danilatos & Robinson, 1979;Danilatos, 1980Danilatos, , 1988Danilatos, , 1990Danilatos, , 1992Danilatos, , 1993aDanilatos, ,b, 2004.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Actually, the field of view needs not be sacrificed, if the instrument were to incorporate the relocation of the rocking point of the beam close to or at the PLA1, which would allow a very large field of view even with the use of very small PLAs including sizes of 100 µm and even 50 µm (Danilatos, 2004). Instead, the minimum size of a rather thick PLA appears invariable by the industry to only 0.5 mm diameter (Stokes, 2008) for a long time, for some hitherto arbitrary reason.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEM can achieve resolution better than 1 nanometer. Specimens can be observed in high vacuum in conventional SEM, or in low vacuum or wet conditions in variable pressure or environmental SEM, and at a wide range of cryogenic or elevated temperatures with specialized instruments [7] The mechanical phases of PBDP were obtained from triaxle tester.…”
Section: Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%