2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priming and statistical learning in right brain damaged patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with the topography of connections that correlated (negatively) with statistical learning, this suggests that the inhibition of the left, in particular parietal, sites is beneficial for statistical memory. This is in line with studies showing that the right hemisphere is important for statistical learning (Roser et al, 2011;Shaqiri and Anderson, 2013;Janacsek et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Together with the topography of connections that correlated (negatively) with statistical learning, this suggests that the inhibition of the left, in particular parietal, sites is beneficial for statistical memory. This is in line with studies showing that the right hemisphere is important for statistical learning (Roser et al, 2011;Shaqiri and Anderson, 2013;Janacsek et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is not possible to draw firm conclusions about the underlying neural mechanisms from the fact that the manipulation of prior probabilities exerted maximum effects at electrode F4 (i.e., right-lateralized). There exist some hints that the right cerebral hemisphere might be dominant for statistical processing in general (Anderson, 2008;Danckert, Stöttinger, Quehl, & Anderson, 2012;Roser, Fiser, Aslin, & Gazzaniga, 2011;Shaqiri & Anderson, 2013).…”
Section: The P3a Component In the Urn-ball Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We initiated these experiments with several expectations: based on our prior probability learning work (Shaqiri and Anderson, 2013), we expected the presence of neglect to interact with statistical learning deficits. Therefore, we partitioned our right brain damaged (RBD) participants into subgroups with (+N) and without (−N) neglect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%