1991
DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90192-f
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Primary health services in Ecuador: Comparative costs, quality, and equity of care in ministry of health and rural social security facilities

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
9
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
4
0
0

Year Published

Range
1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)
references

References 11 publications

0
4
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…But the quality of service in public facilities has declined due to funding shortfalls. Moreover, the quality of care in MOH and IESS facilities is not the same; in rural areas, Social Security clinics provide better care than Ministry of Health clinics [ 58 ]. In either case, health care in the public sector is largely curative rather than preventive, and given poor living conditions and stagnant incomes, as well as the institution of user fees, most of the rural and urban poor are unlikely to be screened for cardiovascular conditions such as high blood pressure, those associated with overweight and obesity (especially diabetes), and cancers (such as prostate, cervical, and colorectal) that are largely asymptomatic until critical stages are reached.…”
Section: Epidemiologic Overlap In Ecuador
mentioning
confidence: 99%