1991
Primary health services in Ecuador: Comparative costs, quality, and equity of care in ministry of health and rural social security facilities
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
9
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
4
0
0
Year Published
Range
1993
2022
Publication Types
Select...
9
1
Relationship
0
10
Authors
Journals
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
References 11 publications
0
4
0
0
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…But the quality of service in public facilities has declined due to funding shortfalls. Moreover, the quality of care in MOH and IESS facilities is not the same; in rural areas, Social Security clinics provide better care than Ministry of Health clinics [ 58 ]. In either case, health care in the public sector is largely curative rather than preventive, and given poor living conditions and stagnant incomes, as well as the institution of user fees, most of the rural and urban poor are unlikely to be screened for cardiovascular conditions such as high blood pressure, those associated with overweight and obesity (especially diabetes), and cancers (such as prostate, cervical, and colorectal) that are largely asymptomatic until critical stages are reached.…”
Section: Epidemiologic Overlap In Ecuador
mentioning
confidence: 99%