2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-015-0708-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primal-Dual Active-Set Methods for Large-Scale Optimization

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce two primal-dual active-set methods for solving large-scale constrained optimization problems. The first method minimizes a sequence of primal-dual augmented Lagrangian functions subject to bounds on the primal variables and artificial bounds on the dual variables. The basic structure is similar to the well-known optimization package Lancelot (Conn, et al. in SIAM J Numer Anal 28:545-572, 1991), which uses the traditional primal augmented Lagrangian function. Like Lancelot, our algo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It therefore seems that commonly used two-phase approaches, although successfully used on many problems, may never reliably produce superlinearly convergent iterates in practice, as predicted by the local convergence theory. This observation leads me to conclude that efficient and reliable globally convergent sSQP methods will either be single-phase approaches or two-phase approaches in which the first-phase also uses some form of dual stabilization (Robinson 2015).…”
Section: One-phase Versus Two-phase Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It therefore seems that commonly used two-phase approaches, although successfully used on many problems, may never reliably produce superlinearly convergent iterates in practice, as predicted by the local convergence theory. This observation leads me to conclude that efficient and reliable globally convergent sSQP methods will either be single-phase approaches or two-phase approaches in which the first-phase also uses some form of dual stabilization (Robinson 2015).…”
Section: One-phase Versus Two-phase Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%