2021
DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of uterine perforation during intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a meta-analysis conducted by Sapienza [62] revealed that patients receiving ultrasonography-guided brachytherapy insertion had a 90% lower rate of uterine perforation per insertion than those receiving unguided insertion. Another important aspect that one can refer to in order to decrease the rate of uterine perforation is that the choice to use ultrasonography as a guide (in ovoid insertion) is tailored to each patient and based on the level of resistance encountered during cervical dilation, with insertion applied only by highly trained personnel (for instance, gynaecologic oncologists), as suggested by Bayrak [63]. Moreover, another method of protection against uterine perforation is the use of a Smit Sleeve (defined as a disposable intrauterine tube that is inserted into the cervical internal os to facilitate precise surgical localisation in cases of cervical cancer).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a meta-analysis conducted by Sapienza [62] revealed that patients receiving ultrasonography-guided brachytherapy insertion had a 90% lower rate of uterine perforation per insertion than those receiving unguided insertion. Another important aspect that one can refer to in order to decrease the rate of uterine perforation is that the choice to use ultrasonography as a guide (in ovoid insertion) is tailored to each patient and based on the level of resistance encountered during cervical dilation, with insertion applied only by highly trained personnel (for instance, gynaecologic oncologists), as suggested by Bayrak [63]. Moreover, another method of protection against uterine perforation is the use of a Smit Sleeve (defined as a disposable intrauterine tube that is inserted into the cervical internal os to facilitate precise surgical localisation in cases of cervical cancer).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As every time the applicator is inserted, there is a risk of perforation, strategies have been tried to reduce the risk. Using a Smit sleeve before brachytherapy is a technique that facilitates accurate tandem placement, and eliminates the risk of malposition of tandem in subsequent insertions, thus reducing the risk of complications [18]. More important is imaging before and after the procedure, which helps to detect inaccurate placement of applicators and aids in dose optimization during computer-based planning process [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical imaging is a necessary component of brachytherapy treatments, with magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) imaging being used to acquire diagnostic images of the patient and localize the applicator position for radiation dose planning after it has been internally placed. Two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) imaging is used to provide real-time visual feedback to the oncologist during the applicator and needle insertion to aid with radiation placement and prevent uterine perforation [3]. However, MR and CT imaging may be unavailable within the operating room in many healthcare centers, especially in those regions where the incidence of cervical cancer is high, increasing the reliance on US methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%