Preventing annoyance from odors in spaceflight: a method for evaluating the sensory impact of rodent housing

Abstract

For the scientific community, the ability to fly mice under weightless conditions in space offers several advantages over the use of rats. These advantages include the option of testing a range of transgenic animals, the ability to increase the number of animals that can be flown, and reduced demands on shuttle resources (food, water, animal mass) and crew time (for water refill). Mice have been flown in animal enclosure module (AEM) hardware only once [Space Shuttle Transport System (STS)-90] and were dissected early in the mission, whereas rats have been flown in the AEM on >20 missions. This has been due, in part, to concerns that strong and annoying odors from mouse urine (vs. rat urine) will interfere with crew performance in the shuttle middeck. To screen and approve mice for flight, a method was developed to evaluate the odor containment performance of AEMs housing female C57BL/6J mice compared with AEMs housing Sprague-Dawley rats across a 21-day test period. Based on the results of this test, consensus was reached that mice could fly in the AEM hardware for up to 17 days (including prelaunch and contingency) and that the AEM hardware would likely contain odors beyond this duration. Human sensory and electronic nose analysis of the AEMs postflight demonstrated their success in containing odors from mice for the mission duration of STS-108 (13 days). Although this paper focuses specifically on odor evaluations for the space shuttle, the concern is applicable to any confined, closed-system environment for human habitation.

Osteoprotegerin is an effective countermeasure for spaceflight-induced bone loss in mice

“…This study represents the first flight of mice on the space shuttle, an important development in the use of animal models in microgravity. As such, we have demonstrated that the young mouse can be considered an applicable model for spaceflight-induced osteopenia [34]. Previous studies of pre-and post-flight finite element models of astronaut's proximal femur following 4.3-6.5 month stays on the International Space Station (ISS) have demonstrated a rapid decline in estimated strength of the proximal femur, on the order of 2.0-2.6% per month [10].…”

Evaluation of Trigeminal Sensitivity to Ammonia in Asthmatics and Healthy Human Volunteers

“…Each participant was asked to refrain from smoking, eating or drinking for at least one hour prior to testing. Prior to the first test, all individuals were screened for normal olfactory function using the NASA Odor Screening Test, which is a 7-item olfactory evaluation method adopted from an ASTM standard method (Dalton et al 2003)…”

Sensory and Analytical Evaluations of Paints With and Without Texanol

“…This testing was seen as especially important for the paint chemists given the nature of their occupation and their probable history of exposure to solvents, which can alter and impair olfactory sensitivity , . Three types of tests were used: detection sensitivity for phenylethyl alcohol, forced-choice discrimination of five qualitatively different odorous chemicals (phenylethyl alcohol, amyl acetate, eucalyptol, menthone, and acetic acid) and a 20 item odor identification test, consisting of numerous everyday food and household odors , .…”