Preventability of Infant Mortality In a Rural Community

Zadinsky, Julie K.; Boettcher, Janet Hardy

doi:10.1097/00006199-199207000-00006

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Kastein and colleagues (1993) found significant differences within groups between specialists and family doctors who had the task of deciding upon criteria for assessing the performance of family doctors. Zadinsky and Boettcher (1992) found differences between nurses' and doctors' ratings of the preventability of infant deaths. However, Tepper and colleagues (1995) examined groups considering criteria for different payment methods for inpatient rehabilitation and found few differences between groups.…”

Section: Do Different Categories Of Participants Produce Different Rementioning

confidence: 86%

Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.

Murphy¹,

Black²,

Lamping³

et al. 1998

Health Technology Assessment

1,378

1,515

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Do Different Categories Of Participants Produce Different Rementioning

confidence: 86%

Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.

Murphy¹,

Black²,

Lamping³

et al. 1998

Health Technology Assessment

1,378

1,515

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Consensus Development Methods

Black¹

2006

Qualitative Research in Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Identifying HIV/AIDS Research Priorities for the Next Millennium: A Delphi Study With Nurses in AIDS Care

Sowell

2000

Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to identify HIV/AIDS research priorities for the next millennium from the perspective of nurses in AIDS care. The study used a three-round Delphi technique, with study participants (the panel of experts) selected from the membership of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. In the first round of the Delphi study, 317 nurses identified more than 2,000 topics they viewed as important for overall HIV/AIDS research and for HIV/AIDS nursing research. Using qualitative analysis, 12 priority topics were generated in the overall research category and 12 priority topics in the nursing research category. In Round II of the Delphi survey, study participants ranked the 12 topics in categories (overall and nursing research priorities) identified in Round I. Finally, in Round III, the top five priority topics from Round II were prioritized in each category. The overall HIV/AIDS research topics identified were (a) HIV community-level education and prevention; (b) development of more tolerable drugs; (c) HIV prevention focusing on individual or specific group behavior; (d) vaccine development; and (e) development of new and more effective drugs. The HIV/AIDS nursing research priorities identified were (a) symptom management; (b) community-level HIV education and prevention; (c) quality of life issues in chronic HIV disease; (d) HIV prevention focusing on individual or specific group behavior; and (e) research related to adherence to drug therapy.

show abstract

Preventability of Infant Mortality In a Rural Community

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.

Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.

Consensus Development Methods

Identifying HIV/AIDS Research Priorities for the Next Millennium: A Delphi Study With Nurses in AIDS Care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About