2016
DOI: 10.17058/reci.v6i1.6272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Exceto onde especificado diferentemente, a matéria publicada neste periódico é licenciada sob forma de uma licença Creative Commons -Atribuição 4. however, its clinical importance is related to infections in newborns, which can cause severe pneumonia, septicemia and meningitis. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of colonization by S. Observou-se colonização em 22,5% (18/80) das gestantes analisadas. Os isolados foram sensíveis a grande maioria dos antimicrobianos testados, com exceção à… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the frequency of colonization by S. agalactiae was 28.4%, and it was higher than that found in national studies conducted in a Primary Health Units (UBS) in São Paulo (17.4%), as well as in private (15.2%) and public (22.5%) centers in Rio Grande do Sul 10 , 12 , 13 . Some studies performed in other countries have also found lower frequencies, ranging from 2.3% to 8.3% 14 - 16 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In this study, the frequency of colonization by S. agalactiae was 28.4%, and it was higher than that found in national studies conducted in a Primary Health Units (UBS) in São Paulo (17.4%), as well as in private (15.2%) and public (22.5%) centers in Rio Grande do Sul 10 , 12 , 13 . Some studies performed in other countries have also found lower frequencies, ranging from 2.3% to 8.3% 14 - 16 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…There was an increase in GBS prevalence in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, considering the results over the last 10 years [39][40][41]. A study with 36 specimens from pregnant women during the year 2006 using culture and latex agglutination for GBS identification found a prevalence of 11.11%.…”
Section: The South Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2011 and 2012, 1041 non-pregnant and 105 pregnant women were enrolled in a study where the prevalence was 15.2% among pregnant women and 6.4% in non-pregnant women [39]. In 2013, another study evaluated specimens from 80 pregnant women and the prevalence rate was 22.5% [40]. The authors compared two identification methods: when the classical method was used alone, 33.75% of women were considered positive, while when it was used along with latex agglutination, the prevalence obtained was 22.5% [40].…”
Section: The South Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations