2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, Symptomatic Burden, and Diagnosis of Endometriosis in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey of 30 000 Women

Abstract: Objective: This study sought to estimate the prevalence of diagnosis of endometriosis (DxE) in Canada and to assess the symptomatic and diagnostic experience of Canadian women with DxE.Method: A cross-sectional, online survey of women in Canada aged 18 to 49 was conducted from December 7, 2018 through January 24, 2019. Survey data were weighted by Canadian population statistics to estimate the prevalence, symptomatic burden, and diagnostic experience of DxE. Logistic regressions were used to assess differences… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(32 reference statements)
3
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research on this enigmatic disease has received global attention. 123 Major areas of focus include (1) disease heterogeneity suggesting possible subtypes or a syndrome with different phenotypes, (2) collaborative approaches across disciplines to understand the complex interplay of multiple factors, and (3) prompt action at the current time when governments and funding agencies have begun to appreciate the enormity of the problem. Underpinning the concept of improved outcomes for women with endometriosis is an understanding of the cellular causes of the disease, studied concurrently with the associated genomic, physiological, and developmental programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Future research on this enigmatic disease has received global attention. 123 Major areas of focus include (1) disease heterogeneity suggesting possible subtypes or a syndrome with different phenotypes, (2) collaborative approaches across disciplines to understand the complex interplay of multiple factors, and (3) prompt action at the current time when governments and funding agencies have begun to appreciate the enormity of the problem. Underpinning the concept of improved outcomes for women with endometriosis is an understanding of the cellular causes of the disease, studied concurrently with the associated genomic, physiological, and developmental programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, 6 to 11% of reproductive-age women are diagnosed with endometriosis. [1][2][3] However, with a current diagnostic delay of 7 to 15 years, 101 it is likely that the proportion of women affected by endometriosis is much larger. While increased education of women, health care professionals, and the general public will gradually aid in preventing unnecessary diagnostic delay, it is unlikely to significantly reduce the time to diagnosis, as there is currently no single imaging technique or laboratory test that can diagnose all forms of endometriosis without surgery.…”
Section: Reducing Diagnostic Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Approximately 6%-10% of the United States, Canadian, and European women of reproductive age are affected. [2][3][4][5][6] Endometriosis symptoms can include severe pelvic pain, even infertility. 7 In a global survey of 1000 women with endometriosis, including women from the United States, 68%-71% presented with pain, 22%-30% presented with infertility, and 7.3%-29% presented with an endometrioma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cross-sectional online survey was performed to assess the symptomatic disease burden of endometriosis in Canada. 16 The present study examines survey responses related to the burden of fatigue and productivity impairment in Canadian women with a self-reported diagnosis of endometriosis (DxE). Three independent response panels were used as sampling frames: the Survey Sampling International panel (now Dynata, Shelton, CT; http://www.dynata.com), the Leger panel (Toronto, ON; https://leger360.com), and the Lightspeed panel (now Kantar, Vancouver, BC; http://lightspeedresearch.com).…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%