2021
DOI: 10.3201/eid2702.204088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2–Specific Antibodies, Japan, June 2020

Abstract: We used 2 commercially available antibody tests to estimate seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in Japan during June 2020. Of 7,950 samples, 8 were positive by both assays. Using 2 reliable antibody tests in conjunction is an effective method for estimating seroprevalence in low prevalence settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…NAT-based case detection in Japan had been counted on as a promising strategy, capable of thoroughly tracking SARS-CoV-2 transmissions, and identifying and sizing cluster infections (1). It was not until June 2020, when the first national seroprevalence survey was performed, that the Japanese realized their 3-8 fold underestimation of the actual spread of the disease within the society (3). With the aim of enhancing case detection for effective quarantine, especially among the pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic affected individuals, testing recommendations since then have shifted from a symptom-driven approach towards a rather universal approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…NAT-based case detection in Japan had been counted on as a promising strategy, capable of thoroughly tracking SARS-CoV-2 transmissions, and identifying and sizing cluster infections (1). It was not until June 2020, when the first national seroprevalence survey was performed, that the Japanese realized their 3-8 fold underestimation of the actual spread of the disease within the society (3). With the aim of enhancing case detection for effective quarantine, especially among the pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic affected individuals, testing recommendations since then have shifted from a symptom-driven approach towards a rather universal approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A signal equal to or above a cutoff of 1.4 Index (S/C) and 50 AU/mL, respectively, was considered serologically positive. An orthogonal testing algorithm was adopted in order to idealize positive-predictivity and determine, with high specificity, the individuals who were truly sero-positive of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies (3). In this algorithm the individuals who initially tested positive for anti-nucleocapsid antibodies were tested with a second test targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen.…”
Section: Serological Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seropositivity for both assays was determined as per the cutoff values provided by the manufacturers. The positive cutoff antibody titer was defined as >0.10 AU/mL for IgG and 0.20 AU/mL for IgM [ 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most seroprevalence studies performed in other settings have included specific high-risk groups or randomly-selected participants which exclude certain population groups, such as ill or quarantined people, or institutionalized individuals, among others [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] . Thus, their results might not accurately reflect the actual seroprevalence in the population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%