2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2009.01425.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of tetM, tetQ, nim and blaTEM genes in the oral cavities of Greek subjects: a pilot study

Abstract: Findings from the present study suggest a high prevalence of tetM, tetQ and bla(TEM), but not nim resistance genes in subgingival and tongue samples from Greek subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(50 reference statements)
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the most prevalent gene in periodontitis was tet ( Q ) while tet ( M ) showed a low prevalence. However, studies by Ioannidis et al [ 55 ] and Kim et al [ 56 ] reported both genes as the most frequent in diseased patients in Europe and the USA, respectively. In Dominican patients, tet ( 32 ) was the second most frequently detected gene in periodontitis; it is worth noting that, to our knowledge, this is the first study to report the presence of this gene in the subgingival biofilm of healthy and periodontally diseased patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the most prevalent gene in periodontitis was tet ( Q ) while tet ( M ) showed a low prevalence. However, studies by Ioannidis et al [ 55 ] and Kim et al [ 56 ] reported both genes as the most frequent in diseased patients in Europe and the USA, respectively. In Dominican patients, tet ( 32 ) was the second most frequently detected gene in periodontitis; it is worth noting that, to our knowledge, this is the first study to report the presence of this gene in the subgingival biofilm of healthy and periodontally diseased patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, 7.7% of 26 subgingival P. gingivalis strains were reported to be β‐lactamase‐positive in one study , and 25.5% of 51 strains in another study were found in vitro to be resistant to amoxicillin, but susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, indicative of β‐lactamase production. Additional β‐lactamase‐positive microbial species and subjects would probably be identified using more sensitive methods, such as molecular analysis of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences or β‐lactamase‐encoding genes , than the culture‐based procedures employed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment was set to have at least 90% power to detect changes of 25% with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 (two-tailed). A pilot study provided the expected values of the primary outcome variable [ 16 ]. For clinical parameters, indicators of descriptive statistics were used, such as the mean and standard deviation for each group, with the patient as the observational unit.…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%