2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Spread of Multidrug Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates Among Nursing Home Residents in the Southern Part of the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, ST131 was observed as the most prevalent sequence type, and ST131 was present in all NHs. 21 In theory, a culture on admission is needed to determine acquisition. However, in the Netherlands, the ESBL-E prevalence is low in hospitals as well as in the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, ST131 was observed as the most prevalent sequence type, and ST131 was present in all NHs. 21 In theory, a culture on admission is needed to determine acquisition. However, in the Netherlands, the ESBL-E prevalence is low in hospitals as well as in the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other epidemiologic and ecologic associations include ST131's predilection for elderly hosts and its high prevalence among longterm-care-facility (LTCF) residents in both the United States (20) and Europe (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). Additionally, infections due to ESBL-positive ST131 have been associated with international travel (26,(35)(36)(37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,25 As found in the study of urinary E. coli from 5 Dutch NHs, CipREc colonization varied by NH, 16 underscoring the possibility that interventions can reduce the occurrence and spread. Indeed, in the parent study for this analysis, there was a 23% decrease in the prevalence of all MDR bacteria among NHs assigned to a multimodal intervention by Mody et al, 18 although we found no statistically significant differences in mean CipREc carriage duration or acquisition rate between the 3 intervention and 2 control homes included here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%