Prevalence and associated factors of depression, anxiety, and stress among Hubei pediatric nurses during COVID-19 pandemic

Zheng, Ronghao; Zhou, Yuren; Qiu, Ming; Yi, Yan; Yue, Jing; Yu, Liping; Lei, Xinyun; Tu, Danna; Hu, Yongqun

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152217

Cited by 72 publications

(87 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The prevalence of stress in this study was in line with the studies conducted in China 56.59%. 6 On the other hand, our estimation was higher than the studies conducted in Spanish 41.1%, 23 India 3.7%, 25 Singapore 6.6%, 13 Turkey 41.2% 30 and Malaysia 29.1%, 28 while the magnitude of stress was lower than studies conducted in China 71.5%, 8 18.0%, 9 Turkey 76.4%, 29 and Alberta Canada 85.6%. 27 This could be the sample size difference, the health system service difference.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 76%

“…Similarly, the prevalence of anxiety was in line with the study carried out in Turkey 60.2%. 29 Conversely, the prevalence of anxiety was higher than the studies conducted in China 46.04%, 6 44.6%, 8 13%, 7 32.6%, 9 38%, 22 Spanish 58.6%, 23 systematic review studies 23.2%, 12 22.1%, 24 India 17.7%, 25 Singapore 14.5%, 13 Nepal 38%, 26 Libya 46.7%, 5 Alberta Canada 47.0%, 27 Turkey 51.6%, 30 and Malaysia 31.6%. 28 The difference could be the sample size difference, the time of the research done, the level of health service development, and the difference in experiences to similar pandemics.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

“…In our study, the magnitude of depression was consistent with the study conducted in Libya 56.3%. 5 On the other hand, the prevalence of depression on health-care workers was higher than the studies conducted in China 44.37%, 6 12.2%, 7 50.4%, 8 15.4%, 9 40%, 22 Spanish 46%, 23 systematic review studies 22.8%, 12 21.7%, 24 India 11.4%, 25 Singapore 8.9%, 13 Nepal 8%, 26 Alberta Canada 44.0%, 27 Malaysia 21.8%, 28 whereas the prevalence of depression in this study was lower than studies done in Turkey 77.6%, 29 64.7%. 30 The reason for this discrepancy might be, the simple size difference, the time of research done.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

“… 8 Similarly, in the study done among nurses in Taiwan who worked during the outbreak of SARS 11% of them had anxiety, depression, and somatization. 9 Besides, in a study done on the mental health effect of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak on health professionals working in Toronto, 30.4% of the participants had burnout syndrome, 44.9% of them had psychological distress, and 13.8%, of health-care workers (HCWs), had posttraumatic stress. 10 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Mental Health Adverse Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Workers in North West Ethiopia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Asnakew¹,

Amha²,

Kassew³

2021

NDT

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The coronavirus has affected nearly every aspect of our lives. Most importantly the health-care workers (HCWs) are under insurmountable psychological pressures which lead them to various mental health problems, such as anxiety, stress, and depression. Objective This study aimed to assess mental health adverse effects of COVID-19 pandemic on health-care workers in North West Ethiopia 2020. Materials and Methods Institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A simple random sampling technique was applied and 419 participants completed the questionnaire. Mental health adverse effects were measured using the depression, anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21). Data were entered into Epi data version 4.4.2 then exported to SPSS version 24 for analysis. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate binary logistic regressions with odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were employed. The level of significance of association was determined at a p-value < 0.05. Results Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress in this study was 58.2%, 64.7%, and 63.7%, respectively Those who had a medical illness, and mental illness, contact with confirmed COVID-19 pts, and poor social support showed a statistically significant association with depression. Female sex, participants who had families with chronic illness, had contact with confirmed COVID-19 case and poor social support had statistically significant association with anxiety, whereas participants who had families with chronic illness had contact with confirmed COVID-19 cases, and those participants who had poor social support were predictors of stress during COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion The magnitudes of mental health problems were higher and the concerned body should emphasize the continuous assessment of the mental health of health-care workers during this pandemic.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 76%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Mental Health Adverse Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Workers in North West Ethiopia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Asnakew¹,

Amha²,

Kassew³

2021

NDT

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The fact that the participants in this study had been exposed to various information on COVID-19, including participating in awareness-raising campaign and having training courses, might be responsible for the lower rates of the mental problem discovered in this population. It has been discovered that obtaining courses related to COVID-19 is protective against mental distress (18). Therefore, providing relevant information to nurses about COVID-19 should be an integral part of the intervention program.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating the Burden of Mental Distress Among Nurses at A Provincial COVID-19 Referral Hospital In Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Marthoenis

Maskur

Fathiariani

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The current outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic distorts not only the physical, but also mental and psychological condition of healthcare providers, especially the nurses who directly working with the COVID-19 patients. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of depression, anxiety and stress among nurses working in a COVID-19 referral hospital in Indonesia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A self-administered questionnaire, DASS21, along with the demographic questions was used to screen the presence of psychological problems and their associated factors. Results: the prevalence of moderate to extremely severe depression, anxiety and stress was 8.7%, 20.7% and 5.8%, respectively. The prevalence rate was significantly higher among those with financial hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic, with 10.5%, 23.5% and 8.1% for depression, anxiety and anxiety (P<.05), respectively. Regression analysis confirmed that these mental problems were associated with the experience of social rejection, either by family or neighbor, because they were working in the hospital during the pandemic. Conclusions: The financial hardship experienced by the nurses during disease pandemic increases their burden of mental illness therefore, providing the financial subsidiary might reduce their financial uncertainty. Furthermore, the motivation to have a positive attitude toward the pandemic, promotion of healthy behavior such as the use of face mask and the provision of sufficient information on the diseases, may help them properly manage their mental distress.

show abstract

Assessing mental health status among Iranian healthcare workers in times of the COVID‐19 pandemic: A web‐based cross‐sectional study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The present study was conducted to assess 3(HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: A total number of 7626 HCWs were included in this web-based crosssectional study, via the convenience sampling technique. To collect the required data, the sociodemographic characteristics information form, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), and the Corona Disease Anxiety Scale (CDAS) were also employed. In addition, data analysis was performed using the SPSS Statistics software (ver. 24), as well as descriptive statistics, Chi-square test (χ 2 ), and univariate/multivariate logistic regression models. Results:The CDAS results revealed that 47.9% and 70.5% of the HCWs had experienced moderate levels of physical and psychological anxiety, respectively. Based on the DASS results, 44.8%, 43%, and 34.8% of the HCWs had been subjected to depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. The logistic regression models correspondingly showed that depression among the HCWs was significantly correlated with risk factors, such as the age groups of 20-30

show abstract

Prevalence and associated factors of depression, anxiety, and stress among Hubei pediatric nurses during COVID-19 pandemic

Cited by 72 publications

References 34 publications

Mental Health Adverse Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Workers in North West Ethiopia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Mental Health Adverse Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Workers in North West Ethiopia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Investigating the Burden of Mental Distress Among Nurses at A Provincial COVID-19 Referral Hospital In Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Assessing mental health status among Iranian healthcare workers in times of the COVID‐19 pandemic: A web‐based cross‐sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About