2011
DOI: 10.1021/jp205314f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure-Induced Spectral Changes of Room-Temperature Ionic Liquid, N,N-Diethyl-N-methyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)ammonium Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, [DEME][TFSI]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
67
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, no crystallization of [C 4 C 1 Im]BF 4 has been observed even at 30.0 GPa . Interestingly, in case of ionic liquids based on the N,N‐diethyl‐N‐methyl‐N‐(2‐methoxyehtyl)ammonium cation, crystallization was observed at 1.2 GPa for the case of BF 4 ‐ anion, whereas crystallization was not observed for the case of [Tf 2 N] ‐ anion even at 5.5 GPa . In fact, we have observed an interesting contrast between the behavior under high pressure of a [Tf 2 N] ‐ ‐based ionic liquid and another ionic liquid with a simple anion, while keeping the same cation: no crystallization was observed for [C 6 C 1 Im][Tf 2 N] up to 4.3 GPa, whereas crystallization of [C 6 C 1 Im]Br was observed already at 1.4 GPa (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In contrast, no crystallization of [C 4 C 1 Im]BF 4 has been observed even at 30.0 GPa . Interestingly, in case of ionic liquids based on the N,N‐diethyl‐N‐methyl‐N‐(2‐methoxyehtyl)ammonium cation, crystallization was observed at 1.2 GPa for the case of BF 4 ‐ anion, whereas crystallization was not observed for the case of [Tf 2 N] ‐ anion even at 5.5 GPa . In fact, we have observed an interesting contrast between the behavior under high pressure of a [Tf 2 N] ‐ ‐based ionic liquid and another ionic liquid with a simple anion, while keeping the same cation: no crystallization was observed for [C 6 C 1 Im][Tf 2 N] up to 4.3 GPa, whereas crystallization of [C 6 C 1 Im]Br was observed already at 1.4 GPa (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…(In crystals, typically only one conformer is present although there can be exceptions.) This equilibrium has been studied experimentally by Raman spectroscopy 20,43 and by electronic structure and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. 12,4348 Under ambient conditions the trans conformer is slightly favored 20,43 and the enthalpy change from the trans conformer to cis is positive by about 3.5 kJ/mol according to temperature-dependent Raman spectroscopy 43 and supported by MD simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equilibrium has been studied experimentally by Raman spectroscopy 20,43 and by electronic structure and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. 12,4348 Under ambient conditions the trans conformer is slightly favored 20,43 and the enthalpy change from the trans conformer to cis is positive by about 3.5 kJ/mol according to temperature-dependent Raman spectroscopy 43 and supported by MD simulations. 12 Pressure-dependent Raman spectroscopy 20 on N,N -diethyl- N -methyl- N -(2-methoxyethyl)ammonium (DEME) TFSA showed an increasing trans / cis ratio with increasing pressure, finding that the partial molar volume of the trans -TFSA anion conformer is 0.7 cm 3 /mol smaller than that of the cis one for that system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a pressure‐induced liquid–solid transition (thus, a transition to a less hydrostatic environment) can be clearly detected by the abrupt increase of this linewidth Γ( p ), as a consequence of the occurrence of nonhydrostatic stresses . This method has been exploited to determine the solidification transition of glass‐formers and, more recently, of ILs . Γ( p ) is obtained at each working pressure by fitting the ruby fluorescence signal by two Lorentzian functions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid–solid transition can be obtained by cooling or by volume compression. They are not equivalent thermodynamic processes because applying pressure mainly induces a variation of density, whereas temperature varies simultaneously kinetic energy and density . In addiction, applying pressure allows the system to experience the repulsive part of the intermolecular potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%