1989
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(89)90084-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure and temperature dependence of reactions proceeding via a bound complex. 2. Application to 2CH3 → C2H5 + H

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are in good agreement with the results of Zaslonko et al [26]. However, no fall-off parameters were reported by Glänzer and Troe; their work on the CH 3 NO 2 (ϩ M) reaction was prior to the methodologies developed by Troe and others [39,40] that describe more accurately the fall-off behavior of a pressure-dependent reaction using a center broadening parameter. Zaslonko et al [26] describe the pressure dependency in terms of the Kassel integral, but do not provide an expression for the center broadening.…”
Section: Reaction Setsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These values are in good agreement with the results of Zaslonko et al [26]. However, no fall-off parameters were reported by Glänzer and Troe; their work on the CH 3 NO 2 (ϩ M) reaction was prior to the methodologies developed by Troe and others [39,40] that describe more accurately the fall-off behavior of a pressure-dependent reaction using a center broadening parameter. Zaslonko et al [26] describe the pressure dependency in terms of the Kassel integral, but do not provide an expression for the center broadening.…”
Section: Reaction Setsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…An alternative representation of F (T) was introduced by Stewart et al (1989) F = [aexp(-blT) +exp(-Tlc)t…”
Section: Combustion Chemistry Of Nitrogen 131mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach taken at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) by Stewart et al (1989) is in many ways similar to that taken by Troe, but the blending function F is approximated differently. Here, F is given by…”
Section: Appendix C: Pressure-dependent Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-the Lindemann et al (1922) formulation, illustrated by reaction (1) in Table C.1; -the Troe (1983) formulation, see for example reaction (2) in Table C.1; -the SRI formulation proposed by Stewart et al (1989), illustrated by reaction (3) in Table C.1.…”
Section: Appendix C: Pressure-dependent Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%