2005
DOI: 10.1080/03610730590882800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preservation of Episodic Visual Recognition Memory in Aging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details are given in Sekuler et al (2005). Crossing five vertical spatial frequencies with five horizontal spatial frequencies generated the pool of stimuli for each participant.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Details are given in Sekuler et al (2005). Crossing five vertical spatial frequencies with five horizontal spatial frequencies generated the pool of stimuli for each participant.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sekuler, Kahana, McLaughlin, Golomb, and Wingfield (2005) showed that young and older participants demonstrated equivalent short-term visual recognition memory, achieving equivalent proportions of correct old-new judgments, at each of three different, brief test delays. The present study adapted these basic methods to examine short-term temporal order memory with new samples of participants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ten older subjects, who were evenly split be-140 tween males and females, were drawn from a pool of independent living, active, healthy older adults. Previous studies with subjects from this pool, though not with the present subjects themselves, showed a striking preservation of visual memory, both for items and serial position (Sekuler,145 Kahana, McLaughlin, Golomb, & Wingfield, 2005;Sekuler, McLaughlin, Kahana, Wingfield, & Yotsumoto, in press). By selecting subjects from this pool we expected to reduce the likelihood that MOT results would be contaminated by general, age-related changes in memory per se.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Because the set of memoranda varies from one trial to the next, successful recognition performance on any trial requires access to episodic information, that is, information about the items seen on that trial. Systematic variation of perceptual differences among stimuli produces highly predictable changes in recognition performance (Zhou, Kahana, & Sekuler, 2004;Sekuler, Kahana, McLaughlin, Golomb, & Wingfield, 2005;Kahana, Zhou, Geller, & Sekuler, in press). These changes, in turn, support detailed quantitative accounts of recognition memory and intentional ignoring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%