2022
DOI: 10.1017/s1474748022000329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescribed Virtual Homological Torsion of 3-Manifolds

Abstract: Let M be an irreducible $3$ -manifold M with empty or toroidal boundary which has at least one hyperbolic piece in its geometric decomposition, and let A be a finite abelian group. Generalizing work of Sun [20] and of Friedl–Herrmann [7], we prove that there exists a finite cover $M' \to M$ so that A is a direct factor in $H_1(M',{\mathbb Z})$ .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of the π1$\pi _1$‐injectivity result in [9] does not need such an interpolation, since the topology of the convex core is simple for surface groups. In [4], Chu and Groves used a local‐global argument to prove the π1$\pi _1$‐injectivity of mapped‐in 2‐complexes in cusped hyperbolic 3‐manifolds, but they do not need to figure out the topology of the convex core, so they did not use an interpolation either.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 411mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof of the π1$\pi _1$‐injectivity result in [9] does not need such an interpolation, since the topology of the convex core is simple for surface groups. In [4], Chu and Groves used a local‐global argument to prove the π1$\pi _1$‐injectivity of mapped‐in 2‐complexes in cusped hyperbolic 3‐manifolds, but they do not need to figure out the topology of the convex core, so they did not use an interpolation either.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 411mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], Chu and Groves proved that, for any compact irreducible 3‐manifold M$M$ with positive simplicial volume and empty or tori boundary, and any finite abelian group A$A$, M$M$ has a finite cover M$M^{\prime }$ such that A$A$ is a direct summand of H1(M;Z)$H_1(M^{\prime };\mathbb {Z})$. Theorem 1.2 does not fully recover Chu and Groves' result, but it can be used to give an alternative proof for the case of closed 3‐manifolds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%