Preparedness and management during the first phase of the COVID-19 outbreak - a survey among emergency primary care services in Norway

Abstract

Background The emergency primary care (EPC) services in Norway have been at the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic. Knowledge about the EPC services’ management of the COVID-19 outbreak can be used to prepare for future outbreaks and improve patient management. The objectives of this study were to identify pandemic preparedness and management strategies in EPC centres in Norway during the COVID-19 outbreak. Methods Questions regarding patient management of the COVID-19 outbreak were included in data collection for the National Out-Of-Hours Services Registry. The data collection was web-based, and an invitation was sent by email to the managers of all EPC services in Norway in June 2020. The EPC services were asked questions about pre-pandemic preparedness, access to personal protective equipment (PPE), organizational measures taken, and how staffing was organized during the onset of the pandemic. Results There were 169 municipal and inter-municipal EPC services in Norway in 2020, and all responded to the questionnaire. Among the EPC services, 66.7% (n = 112) had a pandemic plan, but only 4.2% had performed training for pandemic preparedness. Further, fewer than half of the EPC centres (47.5%) had access to supplies of PPE, and 92.8% answered that they needed extra supplies of PPE. 75.3% of the EPC services established one or more respiratory clinics. Staffing with other personnel than usual was done in 44.6% (n = 74) of the EPC services. All EPC services except one implemented new strategies for assessing patients, while about half of the wards implemented new strategies for responding to emergency calls. None of the largest EPC services experienced that their pandemic plan was adequate, while 13.3% of the medium-sized EPC services and 48.9% of the small EPC services reported having an adequate pandemic plan. Conclusions Even though the EPC services lacked well-tested plans and had insufficient supplies of PPE at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, most services adapted to the pandemic by altering the ways they worked and by hiring health care professionals from other disciplines. These observations may help decision makers plan for future pandemics.

The role of local context for managers’ strategies when adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic in Norwegian homecare services: a multiple case study

“…The document review revealed that national and municipality preparedness plans were outdated and failed to account for a long-term pandemic with such a cross-sectoral impact. This finding is consistent with reports from the early phase on the pandemic, both from Norway [ 2 , 9 , 45 ] and abroad [ 46 ]. By constantly revising guidelines and procedures for their local health system, and by disseminating information and training staff in new procedures, managers improved their understanding of current practice and enforcement.…”

When disaster strikes: staff recall and the use of staff recall systems during mass patient influx at Norwegian emergency primary health care centers – a cross-sectional study

“…When asked about agreements to increase surge capacity with staff not normally employed at the EPHCC, 39,1% replied to have made such arrangements with other health actors in their district. This is also in-line with findings from Dale et al, where 44.6% of the staff that contributed during the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic at Norwegian EPHCCs were other personnel than those employed at the EPHCC [48].…”

Utilization of Norwegian crisis shelters before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…When physical attendance is difficult, a change to phone contact is logical, and this has also been found in studies from other parts of the health care sector. 27 Therefore, it might be useful, looking forward, to have a plan for increasing the number of phone lines to the crisis shelters, and to have more staff available to operate the phones. A qualitative study from Sweden mentions these kinds of challenges for social work professionals at women’s crisis shelters.…”