2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.11.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of rubber/graphene oxide composites with in-situ interfacial design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this process could cause undesired permanent structure changes of GO, and it may usually be conducted in organic solvents, which would not be environmental friendly . Sometimes, a simple non‐covalent functionalization method, which typically involves van der Waals forces, electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bond, etc., could be as effective as the covalent approach. For example, Liu et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this process could cause undesired permanent structure changes of GO, and it may usually be conducted in organic solvents, which would not be environmental friendly . Sometimes, a simple non‐covalent functionalization method, which typically involves van der Waals forces, electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bond, etc., could be as effective as the covalent approach. For example, Liu et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of GO shows a typical (001) diffraction peak at approximately 10.3 , corresponding to a dspacing of 0.86 nm. 37 Compared with GO, the D and G bands of RGO are red shied to 1330 cm À1 and 1564 cm À1 , respectively, possibly because of the restored conjugated structure of graphene. For RGO, the characteristic peak of GO is absent, and a broad diffraction peak appears at approximately 25.8 (d-spacing of 0.35 nm), which is similar to the typical diffraction peak of graphite.…”
Section: Go/rhodanine Redox Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8. Comparison of tensile modulus (at 300% strain) and elongation at break for various nanofiller filled rubber composites [10,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Data in the bracket is tensile strength of the rubber composite.…”
Section: Dispersion Of Bm In the Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As summarized in Fig. 8, in comparison with the rubber composites with comparable tensile strength [10,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], SBR/BM/TA composites exhibit a lower tensile modulus but a higher elongation at break, thus appearing more flexible without sacrificing the tensile strength. Such distinctive flexibility of SBR/BM/TA composites may be associated with interlayer sliding and separation loads, which has been applied to nano-flake filled composites [41].…”
Section: Effects Of Ta On Mechanical Properties and Gas Permeability mentioning
confidence: 99%