2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of 20Ne, 24Mg, 28Si, 32S, and 36Ar targets by ion implantation into thin carbon foils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MP tandem Van de Graaf was used to accelerate a 300-700 nA 2 H 1+ beam to an energy of 22 MeV [23]. 36 Ar targets were produced at the Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics (CENPA) by implanting 3-6 µg/cm 2 of 36 Ar ions into 30 µg/cm 2 natural abundance carbon foils, as described in [24][25][26]. The 36 Ar implantation beam purity was determined by comparing the beam current for components with mass numbers A = 36, 38, and 40 prior to mass selection and they were measured to be 19, 4, and 6000 nA, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MP tandem Van de Graaf was used to accelerate a 300-700 nA 2 H 1+ beam to an energy of 22 MeV [23]. 36 Ar targets were produced at the Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics (CENPA) by implanting 3-6 µg/cm 2 of 36 Ar ions into 30 µg/cm 2 natural abundance carbon foils, as described in [24][25][26]. The 36 Ar implantation beam purity was determined by comparing the beam current for components with mass numbers A = 36, 38, and 40 prior to mass selection and they were measured to be 19, 4, and 6000 nA, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MP tandem Van de Graaf was used to accelerate a 300-700 nA 2 H 1+ beam to an energy of 22 MeV [23]. 36 Ar targets were produced at the Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics (CENPA) by implanting 3-6 µg/cm 2 of 36 Ar ions into 30 µg/cm 2 natural abundance carbon foils, as described in [24][25][26]. The 36 Ar implantation beam purity was determined by comparing the beam current for components with mass numbers A = 36, 38, and 40 prior to mass selection and they were measured to be 19, 4, and 6000 nA, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most recent measurements [4,9] produced values that differed from each other systematically in the region of astrophysical interest by about 4 keV. The earlier measurement [3,9,10] carried a combined statistical and systematic uncertainty of ≈ 0.5 keV. The latter measurement [4] carried statistical uncertainties of ≈ 2 keV and a systematic uncertainty of 4 keV.…”
Section: CL Excitation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] are systematically low and that the systematic effect increases in magnitude with increasing excitation energy (this increase may saturate). Such an increase could result from the fact that the lowest excitation energies were strongly influenced by internal 32 Cl calibration points and that the calibration gradually became more dependent on external calibration points towards higher energies [4], introducing substantial systematic uncertainties from the dependence on the assumed target properties [3,9,10] (primarily) and reaction Q values [9] (secondarily).…”
Section: CL Excitation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%