2015
DOI: 10.1080/00958972.2015.1109643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation, crystal structures and properties of half-sandwich ruthenium complexes containing salicylbenzoxazole ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nitrogen and oxygen atoms form a chelate ring with the Ru metal center, and a chlorine atom completes the coordination sphere. The Ru–N bond lengths of the Ru complexes are in the range of 2.0820(2) Å to 2.1260(2) Å and are consistent with Ru–N bond length values reported for those of half-sandwich ruthenium complexes. , The Ru–N bond length for 4 is 2.1067(14) Å and 2.1260(2) Å for complex 5 , both of which are slightly longer than those observed in the complexes 1 (2.0830(3) Å), 2 (2.0840(3) Å) and 3 (2.0820(2) Å) due to the more bulky substituent on oxazoline group. The Ru–O bond lengths (2.0601(12)-2.0680(18) Å) of the complexes are consistent with that of other Ru complexes reported. It is noteworthy that the average Ru–Cl bond length in complex 3 (2.4283(8) Å) is slightly longer than that in complexes 1 (2.4252(10) Å), 2 (2.4253(11) Å), and 5 (2.4265(8) Å) but shorter than in complex 4 (2.4328(5) Å) due to the repulsion of phenyl group.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The nitrogen and oxygen atoms form a chelate ring with the Ru metal center, and a chlorine atom completes the coordination sphere. The Ru–N bond lengths of the Ru complexes are in the range of 2.0820(2) Å to 2.1260(2) Å and are consistent with Ru–N bond length values reported for those of half-sandwich ruthenium complexes. , The Ru–N bond length for 4 is 2.1067(14) Å and 2.1260(2) Å for complex 5 , both of which are slightly longer than those observed in the complexes 1 (2.0830(3) Å), 2 (2.0840(3) Å) and 3 (2.0820(2) Å) due to the more bulky substituent on oxazoline group. The Ru–O bond lengths (2.0601(12)-2.0680(18) Å) of the complexes are consistent with that of other Ru complexes reported. It is noteworthy that the average Ru–Cl bond length in complex 3 (2.4283(8) Å) is slightly longer than that in complexes 1 (2.4252(10) Å), 2 (2.4253(11) Å), and 5 (2.4265(8) Å) but shorter than in complex 4 (2.4328(5) Å) due to the repulsion of phenyl group.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%