2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of whey protein isolate/polydextrose-based nanocomposite film incorporated with cellulose nanofiber and L. plantarum: A new probiotic active packaging system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreased strength was expected due to the low glass transition temperature (T g ) of FOS (Rajam & Anandharamakrishnan, 2015), related to the plasticizing effects of FOS, as previously reported in starch (Bersaneti, Mantovan, Magri, Mali, & Celligoi, 2016), methylcellulose (Romano et al, 2014), and whey protein films (Fernandes et al, 2020), meaning that FOS interfered with the hydrogen bonds among hydroxyl groups of the matrix (Romano et al, 2014). The impaired elongation found in this study as resulting from FOS addition corroborates results by Karimi et al (2020) with polydextrose in films, but contrasts with those reported by other authors from FOS or other oligosaccharides (Bersaneti et al, 2016;Fernandes et al, 2020;Orozco-Parra, Mejía, & Villa, 2020), and suggests that the interaction of FOS with the matrix was probably very poor, weakening the matrix-FOS interface.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of Filmssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decreased strength was expected due to the low glass transition temperature (T g ) of FOS (Rajam & Anandharamakrishnan, 2015), related to the plasticizing effects of FOS, as previously reported in starch (Bersaneti, Mantovan, Magri, Mali, & Celligoi, 2016), methylcellulose (Romano et al, 2014), and whey protein films (Fernandes et al, 2020), meaning that FOS interfered with the hydrogen bonds among hydroxyl groups of the matrix (Romano et al, 2014). The impaired elongation found in this study as resulting from FOS addition corroborates results by Karimi et al (2020) with polydextrose in films, but contrasts with those reported by other authors from FOS or other oligosaccharides (Bersaneti et al, 2016;Fernandes et al, 2020;Orozco-Parra, Mejía, & Villa, 2020), and suggests that the interaction of FOS with the matrix was probably very poor, weakening the matrix-FOS interface.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of Filmssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Those films and coatings may be used as packaging aids, acting as well as protectant matrices to the probiotics, and presenting bioactive properties, contributing to consumers' health. Moreover, they may extend food microbial stability due to the competitive effects of probiotics against spoilage microorganisms (Espitia, Batista, Azeredo, & Otoni, 2016), as already demonstrated in inhibition zone tests (Karimi, Alizadeh, Almasi, & Hanifian, 2020) or in stability tests with fish (López de Lacey, López-Caballero, Gómez-Estaca, Gómez-Guillén, & Montero, 2012;Mozaffarzogh, Misaghi, Shahbazi, & Kamkar, 2020). The presence of prebiotics, which are nondigestible ingredients that selectively stimulate growth and/or activity of probiotics, such as fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and inulin, has been reported to enhance the viability of the probiotic bacteria in food products (Okuro, Thomazini, Balieiro, Liberal, & Fávaro-Trindade, 2013), including edible films (Pereira et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…and therefore, the antimicrobial activity is not accurately predicted. In addition, the mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of packaging material may be altered by the incorporation of bacterial cells (Bambace, Alvarez, & Moreira, 2019; Karimi, Alizadeh, Almasi, & Hanifian, 2020; Ma, Jiang, Ahmed, Qin, & Liu, 2019; Zabihollahi, Alizadeh, Almasi, Hanifian, & Hamishekar, 2020).…”
Section: Food Applications Of Postbioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the FT-IR spectrum of OWP/CNF0%/NEO0%, OWP/CNF6%/NEO0%, OWP/CNF0%/NEO3% and OWP/CNF6%/NEO3% lm samples. The spectrum of OWP/CNF0%/NEO0% lm sample showed several speci ed peaks which were summarized as follows: 1) Peaks ranging 3117-3842 cm -1 indicated intermolecular O-H stretching vibration bonds of the pectin monomer, the symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibration associated with H 2 O [9] and free N-H groups of proteins [5].…”
Section: Fourier Transforms Infrared (Ft-ir) Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%