2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04135-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative frailty measured by risk analysis index predicts complications and poor discharge outcomes after Brain Tumor Resection in a large multi-center analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frailty in spine trauma outcomes is a new topic, with only 2 previously published studies on the topic, utilizing mFI scores [ 15 , 16 ]. RAI-A, a recently developed frailty index, and its recalibrated version, RAI-Rev, have not previously been evaluated in TSI patients, however RAI has recently been reported to possess superior predictive ability in spine procedures and brain tumor resection patients [ 22 , 23 ]. RAI-based frailty scores comprise a 14-item scoring system as compared to mFI-5 which is based on 5 items, and additionally the 14 items in RAI are more relevant to functional status of the patient as compared to mFI scores, and are thus both conceptually and mathematically superior to mFI [ 20 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Frailty in spine trauma outcomes is a new topic, with only 2 previously published studies on the topic, utilizing mFI scores [ 15 , 16 ]. RAI-A, a recently developed frailty index, and its recalibrated version, RAI-Rev, have not previously been evaluated in TSI patients, however RAI has recently been reported to possess superior predictive ability in spine procedures and brain tumor resection patients [ 22 , 23 ]. RAI-based frailty scores comprise a 14-item scoring system as compared to mFI-5 which is based on 5 items, and additionally the 14 items in RAI are more relevant to functional status of the patient as compared to mFI scores, and are thus both conceptually and mathematically superior to mFI [ 20 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyzed medical comorbidities included diabetes mellitus, COPD, CHF, dyspnea, hypertension, disseminated cancer (defined as multiple metastases by NSQIP), open wound, steroid use, weight loss (substantial unintentional weight loss > 10%), bleeding disorders, preoperative transfusion, transfer status, and preoperative sepsis/septic shock/systemic inflammatory response (SIRS). Preoperative SIRS criteria are defined by NSQIP as the presence of at least 2 of the following criteria: temperature > 38°C or < 36°C, heart rate > 90 beats per minute, respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute or PaCO 2 < 32 mmHg, leukocytosis or leukopenia (white blood cell count > 12,000/mm 3 and < 4,000/mm 3 , respectively) or > 10% immature (band) forms, or anion gap acidosis [ 23 , 29 ]. Additional preoperative comorbidities extracted included functional dependence (both complete and partial dependence) and smoking status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations