Prenatal exome sequencing in anomalous fetuses: new opportunities and challenges

Abstract

PurposeWe investigated the diagnostic and clinical performance of exome sequencing (ES) in fetuses with sonographic abnormalities with normal karyotype, microarray and, in some cases, normal gene specific sequencing.MethodsES was performed from DNA of 15 anomalous fetuses and from peripheral blood from their parents. Parents provided consent for the return of diagnostic results in the fetus, medically actionable findings in the parents, and identification as carrier couple for significant autosomal recessive conditions. We assessed perceptions and understanding of ES with mixed-methods in 15 mother-father dyads.ResultsIn 7 (47%) of 15 fetuses, ES provided a diagnosis or possible diagnosis with identification of variants in the following genes: COL1A1, MUSK, KCTD1, RTTN, TMEM67, PIEZO1; and DYNC2H1. One additional case revealed a de novo nonsense mutation in a novel candidate gene (MAP4K4). The perceived likelihood that ES would explain the results (5.2/10) was higher than the approximately 30% diagnostic yield discussed in pre-test counseling.ConclusionsES has diagnostic utility in a highly select population of fetuses where a genetic diagnosis was highly suspected. Challenges related to genetics literacy, and variant interpretation must be addressed by highly tailored pre- and post-test genetic counseling.

Early Detection of Structural Anomalies in a Primary Care Setting in the Netherlands

“…Indeed, the relatively high percentage of termination of pregnancy after early detection of anomalies in this study is explained by their severity. Early diagnosis becomes especially important with the introduction of prenatal wide exome sequencing [28,29]. In case of anomalies with normal array comparative genomic hybridization, there is still enough time to carry out this advanced genetic investigation within the legal term for termination in most countries.…”

Prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias using a targeted skeletal gene panel

“…All clearly pathogenic variants and likely pathogenic variants were validated using conventional Sanger sequencing methods. A multidisciplinary team of clinical and laboratory geneticists, obstetricians, and genetic counsellors reviewed all the variants in relation to the ultrasound scan findings to make a final decision about the seven variant classifications (eg, positive‐definitive, positive‐probable, positive‐possible, uncertain‐AR Het, and normal) according to the classification scheme of case‐level results by Vora et al…”

Ethical and counseling challenges in prenatal exome sequencing

“…The original study was approved by the UNC at Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board (13‐4084). Trios (parents and fetus) were identified prospectively and retrospectively, as reported previously . Eligible participants included pregnant women with a singleton fetus diagnosed with a congenital anomaly.…”