2010
DOI: 10.2186/ajps.2.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Study for Developing a New Mouthguard Material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polystyrene-polyolefin copolymer-based materials have high shock absorption properties that are equal to or greater than those of EVA and polyolefin (22). EVA, polyolefin, and polystyrene-polyolefin copolymer were compared in the present study in line with many previous studies (6,20,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Polystyrene-polyolefin copolymer-based materials have high shock absorption properties that are equal to or greater than those of EVA and polyolefin (22). EVA, polyolefin, and polystyrene-polyolefin copolymer were compared in the present study in line with many previous studies (6,20,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Several studies have investigated the shock absorption properties of various mouthguard sheet materials, but these results cannot be compared simply because of differences in experimental systems (Charpy or Izod impact test, free-falling ball impact test, and pendulum impact test), such as impact objects (cricket ball, hockey ball, and stainless steel ball) (6,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most dental silicone materials comprise addition-cured silicone. The impact absorption capacity of additioncured silicone denture relining materials is as high as that of conventional mouthguard materials according to the results of previous studies 11) . Therefore, we focused on addition-cured silicone denture relining materials for adjustment of mouthguards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Yokota et al 11) found that the load absorbance of two commercial mouthguard materials was 38% and that of dental silicone materials was 34-49% when compared with a control group in regard to MIF. In addition, the MIF-t was 1.15-1.18-fold longer (commercial mouthguard sheets) and 1.03-1.32-fold longer (dental silicone materials) than that of the control group.…”
Section: Free-falling Ball Impact Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation