2010
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/43/10/105201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predominance of the second-order, two-step mechanism in the electron impact double ionization of helium at intermediate impact energy

Abstract: The (e,3-1e) four-fold differential cross sections (4DCS) are measured for the double ionization of helium in coplanar asymmetric geometry for a wide range of ejected electron energies and at an incident energy of about 600 eV. The experimental angular distributions of the 4DCS are characterized by large angular shifts of the forward and backward lobes with respect to the momentum transfer direction or its opposite, respectively. This validates our previously published results [

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
53
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results in Fig. 1(a) to (c) and in 1(f) have been previously published in [16]. They are reproduced here for the completeness of the discussion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental results in Fig. 1(a) to (c) and in 1(f) have been previously published in [16]. They are reproduced here for the completeness of the discussion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This analysis is described in details in [16], hence it will only briefly be summarized here. TS2 is a two-step process: in the first step, the slowest 'c'-electron is ejected in an (e,2e) ionising process of the He atom, where the corresponding scattered electron (called 'a*') appears with the highest probability at the Compton scattering angle, ±θ a* , corresponding to the Bethe ridge [26,27] in this work, from the equal (case (f)) to the highly unequal (case (e)) sharing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations