2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of posttraumatic growth among parents of children undergoing inpatient corrective surgery for congenital disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
55
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with results of previous studies in which resilience was positively associated with post-traumatic growth in parents of children undergoing surgery for congenital disease [47] and motor vehicle accident survivors [48]. In nonclinical Iranian populations with one or more traumatic events, the two sub-factors of resilience of novelty seeking and positive future orientation were also related to greater post-traumatic growth [49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is in line with results of previous studies in which resilience was positively associated with post-traumatic growth in parents of children undergoing surgery for congenital disease [47] and motor vehicle accident survivors [48]. In nonclinical Iranian populations with one or more traumatic events, the two sub-factors of resilience of novelty seeking and positive future orientation were also related to greater post-traumatic growth [49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The prevalence of PTG for mothers was 75.7%, i.e. higher than the fi ndings in similar studies in cancer survivors, patients and students (15,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). This higher prevalence might be related to the severity of trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Posttraumatic growth is a rapidly developing field of research (Larick & Graf, 2012; Kunst, 2012; Li et al. , 2012), but new and developing in the particular patient cohort (HNC) selected for this systematic review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%