2021
DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1955337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor and placenta growth factor for placenta accreta spectrum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining 12 studies were further scrutinized by reading the full text. Four studies were excluded, two of which only investigated first trimester levels of the markers, 26,27 and the other two studies had skewed data preventing acceptable estimation of the mean ± SD from the median (IQR) including one with a small sample size 28,29 . Finally, eight studies were included in this meta‐analysis 25,30–36 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The remaining 12 studies were further scrutinized by reading the full text. Four studies were excluded, two of which only investigated first trimester levels of the markers, 26,27 and the other two studies had skewed data preventing acceptable estimation of the mean ± SD from the median (IQR) including one with a small sample size 28,29 . Finally, eight studies were included in this meta‐analysis 25,30–36 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Faraji et al was not included due to skewed data preventing accurate mean AE SD estimation from IQR. 29 They have reported significantly higher third-trimester PlGF levels among PAS cases when compared to controls, with no influence related to the type of PAS and proportion of concurrent placenta previa. However, they reported no significant difference in VEGF levels between both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Serum VEGF was able to predict the need for peripartum hysterectomy by plotting RUC curves (AUC = 0.698, 95% CI 0.564–0.832, LR+2.4, LR−0.3, p = 0.004). This phenomenon provides a clear advantage for clinical application ( 16 18 ). However, due to the study's sample sizes and limited relevant reports, these remain controversial conclusions.…”
Section: Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%