2018
DOI: 10.1111/jce.13491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive value of unipolar and bipolar electrograms in idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia mapping and ablation

Abstract: The bipolar reverse polarity characteristic was not a practical method for identifying target in idiopathic OTVA ablation. The unipolar EGM-derived quantitative criteria have better predictive performance than visual inspection of the QS characteristic and are likely to reduce unnecessary ablation sites.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no specific evidence supporting that opinion; in addition, conflicting study results about EAT have been reported. In a prospective study including 22 patients with idiopathic OT‐VAs, Guodong et al reported that the local activation time of successful sites was significantly earlier compared with that of unsuccessful sites (−40 ± 10 ms vs. −28 ± 11 ms; p < .01) and suggested that a local activation time with −30 ms was the best cut‐off value for predicting successful ablation 9 . In 2012, Yamada et al reported that there was no difference in EAT between an initial success group and a failure group, but EAT predicted recurrence after successful ablation in a retrospective study with idiopathic RVOT‐VAs 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was no specific evidence supporting that opinion; in addition, conflicting study results about EAT have been reported. In a prospective study including 22 patients with idiopathic OT‐VAs, Guodong et al reported that the local activation time of successful sites was significantly earlier compared with that of unsuccessful sites (−40 ± 10 ms vs. −28 ± 11 ms; p < .01) and suggested that a local activation time with −30 ms was the best cut‐off value for predicting successful ablation 9 . In 2012, Yamada et al reported that there was no difference in EAT between an initial success group and a failure group, but EAT predicted recurrence after successful ablation in a retrospective study with idiopathic RVOT‐VAs 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was estimated by the time to VA elimination since ablation and ablation applications. 7,10,13 The average IA successful rate (?) was assumed 85% and the difference (?)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, these findings were not repeated by another study. 18 Therefore, the value of the N-uniEGM method is yet to be examined. A previous study reported that a ‘QS morphology’ on a uniEGM can present at both the effective and non-effective targets during mapping and ablation of RVOT-PVCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%