2021
DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2020.2997518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Autoscaling of Microservices Hosted in Fog Microdata Center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This experiment evaluated the proposed distributed model learning effectiveness and compared it with a single standalone learning model ( 1). We focused on two different scenarios, where the processes can work in multiple CPUs in the same place (e.g., Tensorflow working with multiple CPUs in the same machine), or a scenario where CPUs are disaggregated and become independent of each other (e.g., different Edge nodes cooperating).…”
Section: B Comparison Of Single and Distributed Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This experiment evaluated the proposed distributed model learning effectiveness and compared it with a single standalone learning model ( 1). We focused on two different scenarios, where the processes can work in multiple CPUs in the same place (e.g., Tensorflow working with multiple CPUs in the same machine), or a scenario where CPUs are disaggregated and become independent of each other (e.g., different Edge nodes cooperating).…”
Section: B Comparison Of Single and Distributed Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, emerging scenarios like the IoT, smart cities, domotic, intelligent surveillance, and e-healthcare usually require proximity and quick reaction time while generating massive amounts of data transmitted to the analytics applications. Fog computing is more attractive for such demand [1]. Fog computing takes the computation to the Edge, moving data processing close to the sources, and reducing data to synthesized volumes to be transmitted north-bound to the Cloud, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, [26] attacks the problem of defining optimal thresholds for scaling policies with a reinforcement-learning algorithm that automatically and dynamically adjusts the thresholds without user configuration. Finally, [2] proposes an approach that uses a predictive autoscaling model trained on a dataset generated from simulations of reactive rule-based autoscaling. W.r.t.…”
Section: Related Work and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W.r.t. work on workload prediction, such as [2], our global adaptation algorithm ability of detecting in advance service scaling needs is not based on guessing workload by means of logged data, but on mathematically calculating service MCL from system MCL (thanks to service Multiplicative Factor and current number of instances, see formula in Section 3.1). The two approaches are, thus, orthogonal: our approach avoids the negative consequences of the scaling chain effect, but it just passively waits for the triggering event (significant increment in the inbound workload).…”
Section: Related Work and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdullah et al 32 proposed an autoscaling model for requested services delivering on fog micro data centers to improve resource management and enhance response time. Their rule‐based model gathers the training dataset and builds the related prediction through preprocessing and postprocessing phases.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%