2020
DOI: 10.1108/lht-08-2019-0171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive analytics for blood glucose concentration: an empirical study using the tree-based ensemble approach

Abstract: PurposeThe primary objective of this study was to recognize critical indicators in predicting blood glucose (BG) through data-driven methods and to compare the prediction performance of four tree-based ensemble models, i.e. bagging with tree regressors (bagging-decision tree [Bagging-DT]), AdaBoost with tree regressors (Adaboost-DT), random forest (RF) and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT). Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou B [ 30 ] improved the weight update rule of the Boosting algorithm and introduced a misclassification cost mechanism to improve the accuracy. Liu J [ 31 ] proposed the random forest algorithm with weights, introduced weighting techniques in the construction of decision trees, and used voting with weights in the decision process to improve the prediction ability. The feature selection method represents the objects in the original dataset with a subset of features and removes redundant feature information [ 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou B [ 30 ] improved the weight update rule of the Boosting algorithm and introduced a misclassification cost mechanism to improve the accuracy. Liu J [ 31 ] proposed the random forest algorithm with weights, introduced weighting techniques in the construction of decision trees, and used voting with weights in the decision process to improve the prediction ability. The feature selection method represents the objects in the original dataset with a subset of features and removes redundant feature information [ 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be inferred that,the dataset has given RMSE values in the range of 54 to 65 for the tested existing models, while the optimised Regression model has given RMSE of 1.5 units, which shows the supremacy of the method on the dataset. Papers in literature such as [15], [18] which employ individual models such as KNN, SVR and article [26], study in [27], paper [28] and research work [29], which handle ensembles, perform well with minimum error with respect to classifying diabetic and non-diabetic outcomes and in predicting short term diabetic information. But these learners, when used for the diabetic progression dataset have not so well in comparison with the proposed technique.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ensemble has obtained 90% classification accuracy for bagging and boosting methods, with Logistic Model Tree (LMT) as the base model, taking AUC as the performance metric. An empirical study using various tree based ensemble models have been proposed in [29], which discusses performance of Adaboost, GBDT, RF and Bagging techniques, resulting in least RMSE of 0.005 with Adaboost technique compared to other ensembles.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision trees were used as prediction models for risk factor interactions in diabetes and to identify subjects with impaired glucose metabolism ( Ramezankhani et al, 2016 ; Hische et al, 2010 ). Different DT models have been used to identify vital indicators in relation to blood glucose prediction ( Liu et al, 2020 ). One study developed a non-invasive system to detect blood glucose levels based on the conservation-of-energy method and physiological parameters ( Zhang et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Machine Learning Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%