2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Young’s modulus of single wall carbon nanotubes by molecular-mechanics based finite element modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
147
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
11
147
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Cantilevered supporting conditions were assumed in all cases, following [20] and [24, fig 4], because of their easy implementation and interpretation of numerical results. Such restraints have been performed through the introduction of pinned joints at the nodes of the left end of the SWCNT, accordingly with the linear degrees of freedom (DOFs) regarded in our model.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…12 Cantilevered supporting conditions were assumed in all cases, following [20] and [24, fig 4], because of their easy implementation and interpretation of numerical results. Such restraints have been performed through the introduction of pinned joints at the nodes of the left end of the SWCNT, accordingly with the linear degrees of freedom (DOFs) regarded in our model.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence Meo and Rossi [20] used the Morse potential for axial stiffness but linearized angular stiffness. Anyway, from fig.4(a) is expected that the choice of the potential will be inconsequential as far as axial strains remain lower than 0.01 nm (about 7%).…”
Section: Interatomic Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations