2020
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.22457.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV) 3C-like protease (3CLpro) structure: virtual screening reveals velpatasvir, ledipasvir, and other drug repurposing candidates

Abstract: We prepared the three-dimensional model of the SARS-CoV-2 (aka 2019-nCoV) 3C-like protease (3CL ) using the crystal structure of the highly similar (96% identity) ortholog from the SARS-CoV. All residues involved in the catalysis, substrate binding and dimerisation are 100% conserved. Comparison of the polyprotein PP1AB sequences showed 86% identity. The 3C-like cleavage sites on the coronaviral polyproteins are highly conserved. Based on the near-identical substrate specificities and high sequence identities,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
251
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
251
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of success might be related to the above-mentioned plasticity of the binding cavity. Some of these compounds have been used for docking and virtual screening research aimed not only at SARS-CoV [44,45] but also at the novel SARS-CoV-2 [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Such an approach focuses mostly on the structural similarity between the binding pockets, but ignores the fact that the actual available binding space differs significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of success might be related to the above-mentioned plasticity of the binding cavity. Some of these compounds have been used for docking and virtual screening research aimed not only at SARS-CoV [44,45] but also at the novel SARS-CoV-2 [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Such an approach focuses mostly on the structural similarity between the binding pockets, but ignores the fact that the actual available binding space differs significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, an in silico attempt has already been made involving a massive virtual screening for Mpro inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 using Deep Docking [15]. Other recent attempts focused on virtual screening for putative inhibitors of the same main protease of SARS-CoV-2 on the basis of the clinically approved drugs [16][17][18][19][20][21], and also on the basis of the compounds from different databases or libraries [22][23][24]. However, none of such attempts is likely to lead to clinical advances in the fight against SARS-CoV-2 for reasons we elaborate below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (Poon and Peiris, 2020) poses the greatest global health and socioeconomic threat since the second world war. Complete genomic sequences of viral isolates from diverse geographic sites, have rapidly been made available through dedicated resources (Shu andMcCauley, 2017, Goodacre et al,2018) facilitating comparative genomics studies, identification of putative therapeutic targets (Zhou et al, 2020, Chen et al 2020, Robson 2020) and the development of effective prevention and monitoring strategies (Qiang et al 2020). Analyses of available genomic sequences, according to GISAID EpiCoV, suggest major viral clades, S, V and G which, collectively, circumscribe more than 69% of the characterised isolates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sang et al verified the assumption of using HIV-1 protease inhibitors as anti-SARS drugs by targeting SARS-Co-V 3CLpro [73]. The authors employed six approved anti-HIV-1 drugs to investigate their binding interactions between 3CLpro.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%