2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2010.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the in vitro permeability determined in Caco-2 cells by using artificial neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AUC values for fluconazole by the intravenous and oral routes have been found to be similar and more than 90% drug is absorbed after oral administration . Data from Caco‐2 permeability studies confirm the classification of fluconazole as highly permeable …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AUC values for fluconazole by the intravenous and oral routes have been found to be similar and more than 90% drug is absorbed after oral administration . Data from Caco‐2 permeability studies confirm the classification of fluconazole as highly permeable …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…An in vitro log P app (cm/s) value of –4.82 is also reported . Experimental conditions were not provided in the reference.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permeability values for CaCo-2 cells were taken from 58 , except for fenoprofen 59 , phenacetin 60 , and linezolid and prednisolone 61 . Permeability values of MDR1-MDCK cells for pindolol and timolol were derived from 62 and for quinidine from 63 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a slightly larger training set of Caco‐2 permeability, Paixão et al. used artificial neural networks to model the data 12. Similar to the Castillo‐Garit paper, a table is included in the article summarizing prior permeability models and pointing out the rather small average training set size ( n =7 to 106) resulting in R 2 values ranging from 0.16 to 0.74.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%