1966
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.19.4.389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of lean body mass from height and weight

Abstract: SYNOPSIS Lean body mass, calculated from the measurement of total body water using antipyrine space, was estimated in 29 males and 27 females. It was found that the lean body mass could be predicted from the height and weight, and formulae for both males and females have been produced with multiple correlation coefficients (r) of 0-96 and 0-83 respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
185
1
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
185
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They estimated that the relative contribution of skeletal muscle lipase to total LPLA increased upon starvation. This was not apparent in our present study, if we consider that the total adipose tissue mass 29 was…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…They estimated that the relative contribution of skeletal muscle lipase to total LPLA increased upon starvation. This was not apparent in our present study, if we consider that the total adipose tissue mass 29 was…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Because adipocytes contain only 5%-7% water (24), the additional dialysis needed to remove dialyzable toxins might be smaller in people with greater fat mass. In contrast, for a given weight, greater height may indicate greater lean body mass (25), and hence a larger pool of dialyzable toxins. Thus, taller people with ESRD may have a greater exposure to uremic toxins because they may have increased numbers of nonadipocyte cells and more dialyzable toxins due to increased muscle mass, for the same weight on average, as compared with shorter persons (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steady-state EGP during the clamp was obtained as the difference between the mean glucose rate of appearance during the last 40 min and the mean exogenous glucose infusion during the same time period. Lean body mass was estimated by Hume's formula (28). Statistical analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%