2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/263952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of IL4 Inducing Peptides

Abstract: The secretion of Interleukin-4 (IL4) is the characteristic of T-helper 2 responses. IL4 is a cytokine produced by CD4+ T cells in response to helminthes and other extracellular parasites. It has a critical role in guiding antibody class switching, hematopoiesis and inflammation, and the development of appropriate effector T-cell responses. In this study, it is the first time an attempt has been made to understand whether it is possible to predict IL4 inducing peptides. The data set used in this study comprises… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
149
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
149
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So, we subjected the promiscuous CD4 + T-cell epitopes (peptides) to check, whether predicted epitopes are IFN-γ and IL-4 inducer or non-inducer in nature. In this study, the IFN-γ inducing CD4 + T-cell epitopes was predicted by the IFNepitope tool (http:// crdd.osdd.net/raghava/ifnepitope/), an in silico server for predicting and designing interferon-gamma inducing epitopes (Dhanda et al, 2013). The SVM (support vector machine) based method and the IFN-γ versus non IFN-γ model was set as parameters for the prediction of the nature of epitopes.…”
Section: Identification Of Ifn-γ and Il-4 Inducer Property Of The Cd4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, we subjected the promiscuous CD4 + T-cell epitopes (peptides) to check, whether predicted epitopes are IFN-γ and IL-4 inducer or non-inducer in nature. In this study, the IFN-γ inducing CD4 + T-cell epitopes was predicted by the IFNepitope tool (http:// crdd.osdd.net/raghava/ifnepitope/), an in silico server for predicting and designing interferon-gamma inducing epitopes (Dhanda et al, 2013). The SVM (support vector machine) based method and the IFN-γ versus non IFN-γ model was set as parameters for the prediction of the nature of epitopes.…”
Section: Identification Of Ifn-γ and Il-4 Inducer Property Of The Cd4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SVM (support vector machine) based method and the IFN-γ versus non IFN-γ model was set as parameters for the prediction of the nature of epitopes. On the other hand, the IL-4 inducer was predicted by the IL4pred tool (http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/il4pred/), an in silico platform for designing and discovering of interleukin-4 inducing peptides (Dhanda et al, 2013). For the prediction of this nature, the SVM based model was used, whereas the threshold value was set at 0.1 as a parameter of the SVM model.…”
Section: Identification Of Ifn-γ and Il-4 Inducer Property Of The Cd4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we used IFNepitope server for the prediction of IFN-γ inducing HTL epitopes using a hybrid method (Motif and SVM) along with IFN-gamma versus Non-IFN-gamma model [34]. In addition to IFN-gamma, IL-4 and Il-10 properties were also evaluated with IL4pred and IL10pred servers, respectively [35,36].…”
Section: Identification Of Cytokine-inducing Htl Epitopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the Motif-EmeRging and with Classes-Identification (MERCI) Program [34][] to identify motifs exclusively occurring in the A-cell epitopes [35]. Though this program allows searching for gapped and ungapped motifs, but we restricted our analysis to the ungapped motifs.…”
Section: Motif Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to assess the performance of a model on external or independent dataset because the performance of a model in internal validation may be biased due to optimization of the model [27]. The performance of models was measured using standard metrics namely Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy and Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC) [19,35].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Models Using Internal and External Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%