2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of compression strength of ancient mortars through in situ drilling resistance technique

Abstract: h i g h l i g h t s Extensive in laboratory experimental campaign on low-strength mortars. Correlations among the DRMS mode and average values and the mortars' compressive strength. Definition of a stepwise process to apply to the mortar joints of existing buildings. Reliability of the proposed procedure proved by in situ applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several methods [ 25 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] similar to PT that are currently being used for mortar diagnostic, e.g., “Sphere impact”, “controlled penetration” or “DRMS” (based on microdrilling resistance technique and is a modification of older PNT-G test [ 34 ]). Moreover, new methods, such as the “gun penetrometer”, are still under development [ 28 ].…”
Section: Minor-destructive Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods [ 25 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] similar to PT that are currently being used for mortar diagnostic, e.g., “Sphere impact”, “controlled penetration” or “DRMS” (based on microdrilling resistance technique and is a modification of older PNT-G test [ 34 ]). Moreover, new methods, such as the “gun penetrometer”, are still under development [ 28 ].…”
Section: Minor-destructive Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were considered to be outliers if it differed more than one and a half time the interquartile range (IQR) below the first quartile (25 percentile, Q1), or above the third quartile (75 percentile, Q3), a procedure described e.g. in [41]. IQR is the difference between Q3 and Q1.…”
Section: Statistical Treatment Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this limitation, some scholars suggest using non-destructive testing (NDT). There are records in the literature on the estimation of the mortar compressive strength through in-situ NDT methods, such as rebound hammer [1], penetration testing method [2], pendulum rebound hardness [3], and torque penetration testing method [4], equal point hardness tester [5], anti-drilling technology [6], indentation testing equipment [7], and scratch testing [8]. These methods are applicable to architectural heritage because of minimal damage to mortar and more testing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%