2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes11Edited by F. Cohen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

102
9,009
7
44

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11,405 publications
(9,394 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
102
9,009
7
44
Order By: Relevance
“…The transmembrane domain that immediately follows the short cytoplasmic sequence is variable in sequence among subtypes, but in all subtypes is predicted to form a transmembrane helix encompassing amino acids 7–29 when analyzed by the highly reliable program TMHMM 13,14 . The transmembrane sequence has a combined signal peptide-anchor function of directing the NA across the endoplasmic reticulum and also retaining it in the membrane.…”
Section: Neuraminidase Structural Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmembrane domain that immediately follows the short cytoplasmic sequence is variable in sequence among subtypes, but in all subtypes is predicted to form a transmembrane helix encompassing amino acids 7–29 when analyzed by the highly reliable program TMHMM 13,14 . The transmembrane sequence has a combined signal peptide-anchor function of directing the NA across the endoplasmic reticulum and also retaining it in the membrane.…”
Section: Neuraminidase Structural Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2A). The predicted protein has 10 transmembrane domains (data not shown) according to TMHMM Server v. 2.0 [30]. Sequence comparison shows the highest similarity in the two regions containing NBDs of PRP1 with others PGPs from the MRP-like family of Leishmania spp.…”
Section: Molecular Characterization and Analysis Of The Prp1 Genementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane proteins were initially predicted based on positive predictions as lipoproteins, using LipoP 1.0 [52], and PRED-LIPO [53]. Non-lipoproteins were then analyzed for transmembrane domain prediction using TMHMM v.2.0 [54], Phobius [55], HMMTOP [56], CW-PRED [57], and HMM-TM [58]. Non-transmembrane proteins were further analyzed for subcellular localization using PSORTb v. 3.0.2 [59], iLoc-Gpos [60], and CELLO v.2.5 [61].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%