2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting trace organic compound breakthrough in granular activated carbon using fluorescence and UV absorbance as surrogates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
60
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. This establishes TF as a more sensitive spectroscopic surrogate parameter than UV 254 , and is in agreement with a previous study on spectroscopic surrogates in granular activated carbon (GAC) processes (Anumol et al, 2015a). This means that fluorophores have greater adsorptive affinity for the activated carbons than UV-absorbing matter, therefore showing a better dynamic range that can be achieved using TF as compared to UV.…”
Section: Surrogate Model For Prediction Of Torc Removalssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5. This establishes TF as a more sensitive spectroscopic surrogate parameter than UV 254 , and is in agreement with a previous study on spectroscopic surrogates in granular activated carbon (GAC) processes (Anumol et al, 2015a). This means that fluorophores have greater adsorptive affinity for the activated carbons than UV-absorbing matter, therefore showing a better dynamic range that can be achieved using TF as compared to UV.…”
Section: Surrogate Model For Prediction Of Torc Removalssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Fluorescence intensity was normalized by the area of Raman scattering peak of deionized water (Lawaetz and Stedmon, 2009). Fluorescence excitation emission matrices (F-EEMs) were produced for each sample as described in earlier research (Anumol et al, 2015a). Total fluorescence was calculated by integration of fluorescence spectra under the scanning excitation and emission wavelength range (Cheng et al, 2003b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The acquisition of 3-dimensional excitation−emission matrices (EEMs) provides a 'map' of contributions of different component classes comprising dissolved organic matter (DOM). This has resulted in the development of fluorescence indexes that have been shown to be useful indicators of water treatment efficacy [15][16][17][18], or surrogate parameters useful for monitoring the fate of EOCs during conventional and advanced wastewater treatments [19][20][21][22][23]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies dwelling on the use of fluorescence measurements as indicator of treatment performance and EOC surrogate in CW systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%