2019
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the 1p/19q Codeletion Status of Presumed Low-Grade Glioma with an Externally Validated Machine Learning Algorithm

Abstract: Purpose: Patients with 1p/19q codeleted low-grade glioma (LGG) have longer overall survival and better treatment response than patients with 1p/19q intact tumors. Therefore, it is relevant to know the 1p/19q status. To investigate whether the 1p/19q status can be assessed prior to tumor resection, we developed a machine learning algorithm to predict the 1p/19q status of presumed LGG based on preoperative MRI. Experimental Design: Preoperative brain MR images from 284 patients who had undergone biopsy or resect… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Their analysis reveals that the cranial/caudal location of the tumor is one of the most important features in predicting 1p/19q co-deletion. Comparing the performance of our 1p/19q co-deletion prediction and the performance of van der Voort et al 61 , our 1p/19q co-deletion prediction model outperforms their model as illustrated in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their analysis reveals that the cranial/caudal location of the tumor is one of the most important features in predicting 1p/19q co-deletion. Comparing the performance of our 1p/19q co-deletion prediction and the performance of van der Voort et al 61 , our 1p/19q co-deletion prediction model outperforms their model as illustrated in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In addition, Akkus et al 60 do not consider the global information of the tumor, since their dataset uses only 3 slices of the MRI sequence of each patient as input, not the whole volume of the tumor. Another recent study by van der Voort et al 61 (Table 3) utilizes MR imaging features along with patients' age and sex using an SVM classifier to predict 1p/19q co-deletion in LGG patients. The authors use 284 LGG patients for training and another 129 LGG patients for testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al [5] used an analysis to generate radiomics signature by extracting 647 MRI-based features from T2-MRIs and side information of patients. Van der Voort et al [11] used support vector machine classifier to extract features from T1 and T2-MRI along with age and sex information on 284 patients and validated results on 129 patients from TCIA. Yu et al [10] used radiomics based approach on FLAIR-MRI data from single hospital.…”
Section: Case Study Methods # Of Patients Test Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another radiomics based approach was studied by Yu et al [10] on IDH mutation prediction. Van der Voort et al [11] extracted 78 MR image features and applied support vector machine (SVM) on them together with age and sex information for 1p/19q status prediction. Zhang et al [12] also used SVM based approach for prediction of IDH mutation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the 1p/19q codeletion is a prognostic marker of ODs with IDH1/2 mutations [6,7], 30-40% of all ODs are not codeleted at 1p/19q and have a worse prognosis [8][9][10]. Hence, the 1p/19q codeletion is reportedly associated with diagnosis, prognosis, and clinically favorable overall survival (OS) in glioma; however, the exact underlying mechanism remains unclear [3,[11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%