2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4035462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting RNA 5-Methylcytosine Sites by Using Essential Sequence Features and Distributions

Abstract: Methylation is one of the most common and considerable modifications in biological systems mediated by multiple enzymes. Recent studies have shown that methylation has been widely identified in different RNA molecules. RNA methylation modifications have various kinds, such as 5-methylcytosine (m5C). However, for individual methylation sites, their functions still remain to be elucidated. Testing of all methylation sites relies heavily on high-throughput sequencing technology, which is expensive and labor consu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, our study conducted a systematic evaluation of parameters used in RNA bisulfite sequencing and may shed new light on RNA methylation data generation and analysis. Further improvement may be achieved with improved characterization of false-positive sites ( 47 ), alternative deamination techniques ( 49 ), and advance computational modeling for m 5 C calling ( 50 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, our study conducted a systematic evaluation of parameters used in RNA bisulfite sequencing and may shed new light on RNA methylation data generation and analysis. Further improvement may be achieved with improved characterization of false-positive sites ( 47 ), alternative deamination techniques ( 49 ), and advance computational modeling for m 5 C calling ( 50 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random forest is widely applied in analyzing biological and biomedical data. Several previous studies indicate the satisfactory performance of RF ( Pan et al, 2010 ; Zhao et al, 2018 ; Jia et al, 2020 ; Chen et al, 2021 , 2022 ; Ding et al, 2022 ; Li Z. et al, 2022 ; Wu and Chen, 2022 ; Zhou et al, 2022 ). RF is a meta-classifier because it consists of numerous decision trees.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Here, two classic base classifiers, namely, SVM ( Cortes and Vapnik, 1995 ) and RF ( Breiman, 2001 ), were used, which were widely applied in tackling many biological problems ( Kandaswamy et al, 2011 ; Nguyen et al, 2015 ; Chen et al, 2017 ; Zhou JP. et al, 2020 ; Zhou J.-P. et al, 2020 ; Liang et al, 2020 ; Liu et al, 2021 ; Onesime et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2021 ; Zhu et al, 2021 ; Chen et al, 2022 ; Ding et al, 2022 ; Li et al, 2022 ; Wu and Chen, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%