2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2014.6943030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting object interactions from contact distributions

Abstract: Abstract-Contacts between objects play an important role in manipulation tasks. Depending on the locations of contacts, different manipulations or interactions can be performed with the object. By observing the contacts between two objects, a robot can learn to detect potential interactions between them.Rather than defining a set of features for modeling the contact distributions, we propose a kernel-based approach. The contact points are first modeled using a Gaussian distribution. The similarity between thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods have also relied on the geometries of objects and scenes to reason about preferred object placements [11] or likely places to find an object [3]. Moreover, Kroemer and Peters used 3D object models to extract contact point distributions for predicting interactions between objects [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods have also relied on the geometries of objects and scenes to reason about preferred object placements [11] or likely places to find an object [3]. Moreover, Kroemer and Peters used 3D object models to extract contact point distributions for predicting interactions between objects [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most such models are of qualitative effects (Montesano et al 2008;Moldovan et al 2012;Hermans et al 2011;Fitzpatrick et al 2003;Ridge et al 2010;Kroemer and Peters 2014), although metrically precise models have been learned (Meriçli et al 2014;Scholz and Stilman 2010). These learn action-effect correlations.…”
Section: The Importance Of Prediction For Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been used to learn the dynamics of an object with a single, constant contact (such as pole balancing) (Schaal 1997;Atkeson and Schaal 1997). Finally, there has been work on affordance learning, and work on identifying which variables are relevant to predicting object motion (Montesano et al 2008;Moldovan et al 2012;Hermans et al 2011;Fitzpatrick et al 2003;Ridge et al 2010;Kroemer and Peters 2014). The restriction of these papers is that they make qualitative predictions of object motion, such as a classification of the type of motion outcome.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We initialized the model using spectral clustering [8]. Given that phase transitions often correspond to the making or breaking of contacts [12], [19], the similarity between samples was computed using contact distribution kernels [24]. Thus, samples were clustered together if they had similar contacts between the hands and object, as well as the object and the table.…”
Section: Model Learning Using Expectation-maximizationmentioning
confidence: 99%