2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Clinically Significant Changes in Motor and Functional Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
29
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the control group showed ambiguous score changes (5-10 points). Hsieh et al, (2014) reported that participants with a baseline BBT score of 10-20 were more likely to achieve FMA-UE improvements, compared with those with a BBT score of <10. Thus, participants of this study might have had a greater chance of improvement after intervention than individuals with a lower BBT scores.…”
Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the control group showed ambiguous score changes (5-10 points). Hsieh et al, (2014) reported that participants with a baseline BBT score of 10-20 were more likely to achieve FMA-UE improvements, compared with those with a BBT score of <10. Thus, participants of this study might have had a greater chance of improvement after intervention than individuals with a lower BBT scores.…”
Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the time to complete the J-T test in no more than 30% over the non-paretic hand was achieved by 21% and 14% of males and females respectively. These data could not be tested for statistical significance due to the very small number of patients, however, it appears to suggest both females and males have similar chance for very good prognosis of recovering upper extremity function if their motor loss following stroke was not severe [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,10]), rehabilitacja prowadzona z wykorzystaniem robotów może być skuteczniejsza niż prowadzona klasycznymi metodami, roboty rehabilitacyjne mają jednak poważne wady. Przede wszystkim koszt takich urządzeń jest wysoki -przykładowy koszt robota rehabilitacyjnego przytoczony w pracy [11] to 200 000 USD.…”
Section: Stan Wiedzyunclassified