2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2019.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting citation counts based on deep neural network learning techniques

Abstract: With the growing number of published scientific papers world-wide, the need to evaluation and quality assessment methods for research papers is increasing. Scientific fields such as scientometrics, informetrics, and bibliometrics establish quantified analysis methods and measurements for evaluating scientific papers. In this area, an important problem is to predict the future influence of a published paper. Particularly, early discrimination between influential papers and insignificant papers may find importan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study, Abrishami and Aliakbary (2019) utilized a machine learning tool to present a model for predicting the long‐term citations of scientific papers based on the number of citations in the first few years of their publication. Based on their experiments, they claimed that their proposed method provided more accurate predictions compared to the other advanced methods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, Abrishami and Aliakbary (2019) utilized a machine learning tool to present a model for predicting the long‐term citations of scientific papers based on the number of citations in the first few years of their publication. Based on their experiments, they claimed that their proposed method provided more accurate predictions compared to the other advanced methods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following works formally defined this task and thoroughly examined various possible factors correlated with citation counts (Yan et al, 2011;Bhat et al, 2015;Chen and Zhang, 2015;Singh et al, 2015;Chen and Zhang, 2015;Park et al, 2017). These studies mainly model the long-term scientific impact (Wu et al, 2019;Abrishami and Aliakbary, 2018;Yuan et al, 2018). Furthermore, some researchers casted the problem as a time series task, and focused on analyzing temporal features or patterns in the process of citation growth (Davletov et al, 2014;Xiao et al, 2016;Yuan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yan et al [32] and others used machine learning algorithms for citation count prediction, including CART, SVM, MLR. Latest, in-depth learning, such as RNNs, was introduced to learn a prediction model based on the sequence pattern of the citations with early information [33]. However, only instantaneous citation features are used to modeling RNN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%