2021
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.104.014205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting amplitude death with machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We predict correlation matrices for cases that closely match real-world scenarios. A dynamic system with a fixed number of nodes can undergo two types of changes (1) coupling strength between nodes can either increase or decrease. (2) a small structural change with rearrangement of links between nodes.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We predict correlation matrices for cases that closely match real-world scenarios. A dynamic system with a fixed number of nodes can undergo two types of changes (1) coupling strength between nodes can either increase or decrease. (2) a small structural change with rearrangement of links between nodes.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning has been applied in diverse areas of physical sciences ranging from condensed matter to high energy physics to complex systems. In complex systems, neural network-based machine learning techniques have been used in predicting amplitude death [1], anticipation of synchronization [2], phase transitions in complex networks [3], time series prediction [4], etc. In particular, forecasting time series data has attracted interest from the scientific fraternity due to its diverse applications in real-world dynamical systems like stock markets and the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While prediction of stationary systems by machine learning (ML) has received much recent attention, less progress has been made in applying ML to the problem of predicting the time evolution of nonstationary dynamical systems, particularly of their climate and of the tipping points they may experience. Refer to [12,[28][29][30] for recent works which apply machine learning to the problem of predicting the short-term state evolution of non-stationary dynamical systems and to [27,[31][32][33][34] for recent works which aim to address the problem of predicting changing statistical properties of non-stationary dynamical systems (including anticipating tipping points). In previous work [27] we demonstrated that ML provides a promising avenue for predicting the climate of a non-stationary dynamical system using the time series of its past states and knowledge of a non-stationarity-inducing system parameter time dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in previous work on predicting tipping points and the associated post-tipping-point dynamics [27,33,34] ML prediction was considered for cases in which the training data was obtained from orbits that typically explored large state space regions that included all or most of the state space visited by the predicted future orbits. Thus, in this prior work the ML predictor was directly aware of dynamical system information needed for the prediction of the future behavior, e.g., after a predicted tipping point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation