Predicting ability to drive after stroke

Mazer, Barbara; Korner‐Bitensky, Nicol; Sofer, Shaul

doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90350-1

Cited by 165 publications

(122 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

111

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, longer completion time on Trails B has been related to visual scanning difficulties, whereas errors are more closely related to executive functioning and working memory problems (Mahurin et al, 2006). Indeed, in those with specific health conditions, such as stroke, these discrepancies have been similarly documented (Mazer et al, 1998). Additional research is warranted to further determine the sensitivity and specificity of using time to complete and number of errors scores on the Trail Making Test in predicting driving perception and behavior.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between cognitive performance, perceptions of driving comfort and abilities, and self-reported driving restrictions among healthy older drivers

Rapoport

Naglie

Weegar

et al. 2013

Accident Analysis & Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the present study was to examine the relationship between cognitive performance, driver perceptions and self-reported driving restrictions. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on baseline data from Candrive II, a five-year prospective cohort study of 928 The baseline data indicates this cohort is largely a cognitively intact group. Univariate regression analysis showed that longer Trails A and B completion times were significantly, but only modestly associated with reduced driving frequency and perceived driving abilities and comfort, as well as a significant tendency to avoid more difficult driving situations (all p < .05). Most of these associations persisted after adjusting for age and sex, as well as indicators of health, vision, mood and physical functioning. Exceptions were Trails A and B completion times and situational driving frequency, as well as time to complete Trails B and current driving restrictions. After adjusting for the confounding factors, the total MoCA score was not associated with any of the driving measure scores while the number of errors on Trails A was significantly associated only with situational driving frequency and number of errors on Trails B was significantly associated only with situational driving avoidance. Prospective follow-up will permit examination of whether baseline cognition or changes in cognition are associated with changes in driver perceptions, actual driving restrictions and on-road driving outcomes (e.g., crashes, violations) over time.4

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between cognitive performance, perceptions of driving comfort and abilities, and self-reported driving restrictions among healthy older drivers

Rapoport

Naglie

Weegar

et al. 2013

Accident Analysis & Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are a number of advantages that a specifically designed battery of tests of cognitive functions can confer for determining safe on-road driving: (1) using face validity hardware and software, so possible referrals can see how their deficits 1997; Galski et al, 1993;Lundqvist, Gerdle, & Rönnberg, 2000;Mazer et al, 1998;McKenna, Jefferies, Dobson, & Frude, 2004;Myers, Ball, Kalina, Roth, & Goode, 2000;Nouri, Tinson, & Lincoln, 1987).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Gish, Decina, Lococo, & McKnight, 1998;Wild & Cotrell, 2003;Wilson & Smith, 1983) and associated with previous incidents of unsafe driving or on-road driving assessment outcome (e.g., Galski, Bruno, & Ehle, 1993;Mazer, Korner-Bitensky, & Sofer, 1998;McKnight & McKnight, 1999;Schanke & Sundet, 2000).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance in normal subjects on a novel battery of driving-related sensory-motor and cognitive tests

Innes

Jones

Anderson

et al. 2009

Behavior Research Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Conversely, basic deficits and risk of crashes can be moderated by higherorder cognitive abilities such as self-awareness of disease [21,[48][49][50][51][52]. It follows that patients with severe physical or cognitive disabilities, and a high risk factor for accidents, can be at low risk if they appreciate the relevance of their deficits and act consequently.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%