2023
DOI: 10.1109/tcyb.2022.3204275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predefined-Time Adaptive Neural Tracking Control of Switched Nonlinear Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The switching rules are also called switching signals which decide the switching manner between the different controlled subsystems. Due to the arbitrary switching performance of the switching signals, a large number of interesting results for switched systems have been reported in References 4‐14. Some scholars adopted the average dwell time approach to design the actual controller for the nonlinear switching systems in References 4‐7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The switching rules are also called switching signals which decide the switching manner between the different controlled subsystems. Due to the arbitrary switching performance of the switching signals, a large number of interesting results for switched systems have been reported in References 4‐14. Some scholars adopted the average dwell time approach to design the actual controller for the nonlinear switching systems in References 4‐7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars adopted the average dwell time approach to design the actual controller for the nonlinear switching systems in References 4‐7. Others proposed the adaptive control schemes for switching systems by introducing the common Lyapunov functions (CLFs) in References 8‐14. The understanding of the CLFs is that a switched system can be guaranteed to be asymptotically stable if and only if all subsystems depend on a common Lyapunov function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A finite‐time fuzzy command filter control design for stochastic nonlinear systems with input quantization was carried out by Kang et al 18 Furthermore, the above studies on the fast FTS problem cannot deal with completely unknown non‐linear functions. Fortunately, fuzzy logic systems and neural networks could have been confirmed to be valid appliances to approximate nonlinear functions 19‐29 . For instance, Reference 19 investigates global adaptive control based on fuzzy approximation 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, fuzzy logic systems and neural networks could have been confirmed to be valid appliances to approximate nonlinear functions. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] For instance, Reference 19 investigates global adaptive control based on fuzzy approximation. 19 Cui et al 28 researched adaptive fuzzy control for MIMO nonlinear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a neural network (NN)‐aided adaptive observer is developed for the observation of actuator faults 6 . In Reference 13 adaptive control, backstepping technique, and finite‐time stability theory, an adaptive finite‐time tracking controller is developed with unmodeled dynamics and dynamic disturbances. A robust fault‐tolerant control protocol proposed in Reference 14 that takes the effect of time‐varying actuator faults and actuator saturation is considered for finite‐time leader‐following consensus of nonlinear discrete‐time MAS with Markov jump parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%