2000
DOI: 10.1139/z00-164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predator-recognition training enhances survival of brook trout: evidence from laboratory and field-enclosure studies

Abstract: In this study we tested whether brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) can learn to recognise predators through releaser-induced recognition learning and whether this learning enhances survival of trout during encounters with a predator. In our initial experiment, we exposed hatchery-reared predator-naïve brook trout to chemical stimuli from predatory chain pickerel (Esox niger) paired with alarm signals released by damaged trout, disturbance signals, or distilled water. In subsequent tests 24 h later, when only … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
124
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the few studies that have examined the use of disturbance cues in predator learning have failed to provide support for this mechanism [34,35]. The results of the present study are similar to previous findings from freshwater fishes [34,35]: damselfish possess disturbance cues that are able to elicit increased anti-predator behaviour when detected; however, these cues do not mediate learned predator recognition. Some have argued that the absence of learning is due to the context in which disturbance cues are released.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, the few studies that have examined the use of disturbance cues in predator learning have failed to provide support for this mechanism [34,35]. The results of the present study are similar to previous findings from freshwater fishes [34,35]: damselfish possess disturbance cues that are able to elicit increased anti-predator behaviour when detected; however, these cues do not mediate learned predator recognition. Some have argued that the absence of learning is due to the context in which disturbance cues are released.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Brown and Laland, 2001;Stunz and Minello, 2001;Young et al, 2008), exposing M. dalli to predators in the hatchery might increase their predator avoidance abilities, as has been shown in other species (e.g. Brown and Smith, 1998;Fu, 2015;Mirza and Chivers, 2000).…”
Section: Predation On Postlarval Metapenaeus Dallimentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Hence, the inability of amphibian tadpoles to innately recognise chemical cues from exotic predatory turtles may represent a further competitive advantage for introduced turtles over native ones in the Iberian Peninsula (POLO-CAVIA et al, 2010b). However, the magnitude and impact of this evolutionary release on native populations of Iberian turtles remains uncertain, as amphibian prey might acquire learned recognition of novel competitive predators and enhance survival (MIRZA & CHIVERS, 2000;GAZDEWICH & CHIVERS, 2002;POLO-CAVIA & GOMEZ-MESTRE, 2014).…”
Section: Synthesis and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%